Skip to comments.
Pictured: The Massive Floating Destroyer The Americans Are Sending To Keep North Korean Missiles...
Telegraph(UK) ^
| June 19, 2009
Posted on 06/19/2009 6:08:19 PM PDT by Steelfish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
1
posted on
06/19/2009 6:08:19 PM PDT
by
Steelfish
To: Steelfish
We got yer massive all right.
2
posted on
06/19/2009 6:11:15 PM PDT
by
Tainan
(Cogito, ergo conservatus)
To: Steelfish
My headline:
“Obama sends McCain to deal with NK threat”
3
posted on
06/19/2009 6:12:43 PM PDT
by
dk88
(Kill it grill it)
To: Steelfish
As opposed to a non-floating destroyer?
4
posted on
06/19/2009 6:13:00 PM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 151 of our national holiday from reality.)
To: Steelfish
Big sounding story, but according to the fine print, we aren’t going to do anything.
5
posted on
06/19/2009 6:15:16 PM PDT
by
pallis
To: pallis
“Big sounding story, but according to the fine print, we aren’t going to do anything.”
Just like the senator nothing good will be done!
6
posted on
06/19/2009 6:19:21 PM PDT
by
Cheetahcat
(Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
To: Steelfish
USS John McCain
7
posted on
06/19/2009 6:21:40 PM PDT
by
LucyT
To: null and void
The massive floating destroyerWell it is massive, so that it floats may shock some. The headline makes it sound like it isn't even under power.
8
posted on
06/19/2009 6:21:52 PM PDT
by
1010RD
(First Do No Harm)
To: Steelfish
9
posted on
06/19/2009 6:23:40 PM PDT
by
blam
To: Steelfish
Sunny beaches! It FLOATS! I am stuneded.
10
posted on
06/19/2009 6:24:40 PM PDT
by
stboz
To: Steelfish
Since when is a Destroyer a “massive” ship. They are used as life boats for Air Craft carriers.
11
posted on
06/19/2009 6:25:14 PM PDT
by
Jeff Gordon
(Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Steelfish
12
posted on
06/19/2009 6:25:23 PM PDT
by
LucyT
To: blam
13
posted on
06/19/2009 6:26:44 PM PDT
by
WellyP
To: Steelfish
It promised ‘100- or 1,000-fold’ retaliation if provoked.
**********
If so,we could give them a 5 megaton retaliation.
14
posted on
06/19/2009 6:26:53 PM PDT
by
Finalapproach29er
(A woman will be the next President; I hope it's Palin instead of HRC.)
To: LucyT
Remember last week or so. This is the same ship that caught a Chinese sub in its towed array.
To: dk88
16
posted on
06/19/2009 6:27:50 PM PDT
by
kalee
(01/20/13 The end of an error.... Obama even worse than Carter.)
To: 1010RD
The headline makes it sound like it isn't even under power.LMAO. Right it's just floating. Like my rubber duckie.
17
posted on
06/19/2009 6:28:10 PM PDT
by
Kudsman
(A lifetime of public service = a lifetime of getting serviced by the public.- Mark Steyn)
To: Jeff Gordon
Massive? Destroyers have a nickname, Tin Can for a reason. Massive is the Ronald Reagan or any CVN ship. 5000 sailors in one ship. Small city on the move.
18
posted on
06/19/2009 6:28:44 PM PDT
by
Texas resident
(Texan by birth and by choice.)
To: LucyT
To: Steelfish
“The resolution bans North Korea from exporting a wide range of weaponry - but does not allow the US to forcibly board the vessel.
Instead, they would have to ask for permission - which, in all likelihood, would not be granted. “
So...we ask to inspect the ship...NK refuses and then that’s it? Welcome to the Era of Useless Diplomacy..
20
posted on
06/19/2009 6:29:33 PM PDT
by
heiss
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
