There you go with the soup misconception [excerpt]Soup being defined as that magic source material from which Evolutionists assert all life originated from.
So what do find lacking in the evidence? [excerpt]Mostly Objectivity in the interpretation thereof. (there is also the flawed methodology used)
All that evolution states is that the change somehow gives the organism a reproductive advantage. That change does not necessarily have to be upwards. [excerpt]A process that yields an ever increasing advantage [whether it be reproductive or otherwise] is an upwards process.
Well it is time for bed. [excerpt]Night!
It is no valid objection that science as yet throws no light on the far higher problem of the essence or origin of life (Darwin, Charles. The Origin of Species. 6th edition, 1882. p. 421).
What evidence is being misinterpreted?
What methodology is flawed, and how so?