Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SteamShovel
"We have at least had a few 5-4 decisions in our favor. This pick will change that. Now we will get ZERO 5-4 decisions in our favor.

I think you're confusing Souter with Kennedy. Souter was picked by GHW Bush and Kennedy was picked by Reagan. While it's true that Kennedy sometimes does not side with the Scalia side of the court (most recently in some of the WOT ruling), he's a fairly conservative justice.

Souter, on the other hand, virtually never sides with Scalia, and has never ruled with the conservatives on any of the landmark cases that have come before him during his tenure. Despite being nominated by Bush, he has been one of the most reliable "progressive" justices in the last 25 years. His departure will do nothing to change the balance of the court.

23 posted on 05/25/2009 12:50:14 PM PDT by Big_Monkey (Obama Motors - you're going to pay for my cars whether you bought one or not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Big_Monkey; ilgipper
I think you're confusing Souter with Kennedy.

I hadn't considered that. So as you say, if that is the case, then the court doesn't change. We may end up better off than I thought. Hopefully the only vacancies that occur for Obama are the hard left justices, meaning the court will still swing right from time to time.

28 posted on 05/25/2009 2:10:02 PM PDT by SteamShovel (When hope trumps reality, there is no hope at all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson