Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DC Smackdown: Advanatge Cheney
CBS News ^ | May 21, 2009 | (CBS) Pejman Yousefzadeh: Senior Editor of The New Ledger

Posted on 05/21/2009 5:27:46 PM PDT by lewisglad

Before weighing in on the split-screen showdown that occurred today in Washington, let me be clear about the views I have on the questions before us: I write as one who believes that waterboarding is counterproductive at best, and torture at worst.

I write as one who believes that torture rarely is justified. And I write as one who believes that the patient and ingratiating questioning of terrorists conducted by the FBI has done more to give the United States actionable intelligence than have the interrogation methods implemented by the CIA--methods that were used by people who meant well, but who did not get as much valuable intelligence as did their FBI counterparts.

It would be logical to assume, therefore, that I would be open to many of the arguments President Obama made concerning our anti-terror strategy, our system of prosecuting terrorist suspects, and our methods of interrogation. But I would be lying if I didn't say that I believe former Vice President Cheney had the better of the argument.

Judging forensics and rhetoric, it is clear that while President Obama came to make a speech, Vice President Cheney came to have a debate. The debater succeeded in making his points better than the speechmaker because while the President is justly celebrated for his vaunted eloquence, he phoned in his speech and thought that the use of pretty words alone would allow him to carry the day. Meanwhile, the Vice President--no one's idea of a charismatic rock star--was forced to make up for his lack of a silver tongue by tightly and carefully constructing reasoned arguments to support his position. It should come as no surprise that the Vice President was quite persuasive and a force to be reckoned with in the debate.

While the President's speech was the longer one, this length did not make it more thorough - in fact, there are so many holes in his remarks it is difficult to keep track of them all. He maintains that his decision to use military commissions is not a reversal of an earlier position because it is supposedly improves on the Bush Administration approach to the use of military commissions. By this, he means that the Obama Administration will supposedly give detainees greater access to quality representation, and will reform the rules against hearsay. But as the Wall Street Journal pointed out recently, under the Bush Administration, detainees already were the beneficiaries of pro bono legal representation from top-flight, white-shoe law firms.

Additionally, the hearsay rules were the same ones employed by the International Criminal Court, which liberals who support President Obama have repeatedly urged us to become subject to as a country. The President's protestations to the contrary, his decision to employ military commissions does constitute a reversal, one that belatedly acknowledges that the Bush Administration had some good ideas and good points to make about the use of such commissions.

The President tells us that decisions in the past were made out of "fear." This is a straw man argument, meant to denigrate the President's opponents without acknowledging that perhaps, just perhaps, they made their arguments in good faith. But even if we put that objection aside, as Commentary's John Podhoretz reminds us, fear was "the handmaiden of foresight" because it allowed us to think of the worst possible forms of terrorist attack that might take place, and to take action to prevent those scenarios from becoming reality. One can certainly overdose on fear, but the reason we feel fear is so that we can take action before actual harm comes to us. The President ignores this, and argues that fear necessarily equates to irrationality. He could not be more wrong.

Equally wrong is the belief--suggested by the President's words--that somehow, the United States only became unpopular because of the use of enhanced interrogation techniques. This is not true; September 11th and the killing of Daniel Pearl--among other outrages--occurred prior to any information concerning enhanced interrogation being made public. Does the President propose that we ignore this history? We would do so at our peril.

In contrast to the President's vague generalities, the Vice President provided specific and detailed arguments explaining why the Bush Administration took the actions that it did. One is not forced to accept those arguments, and as I write, I find a number of them unpersuasive.

But at the very least, the Vice President tried to persuade, unlike the President, who simply thought that he could substitute rhetorical razzle-dazzle for argument. And the Vice President made an excellent point in his speech: Since the Obama Administration saw fit to release the interrogation memos, why does it not declassify and release memos detailing how successful those interrogations might have been? I am not sure they were successful, but I would like to have the full evidence before me in order to make a fully informed decision.

Judging forensics and rhetoric, it is clear that while President Obama came to make a speech, Vice President Cheney came to have a debate.

Pejman YousefzadehIt seems as if the Obama Administration is incredibly capricious about the evidence it chooses to release, and the evidence it chooses to keep under wraps. This capriciousness is puzzling; by calling for the release of memos detailing how successful enhanced interrogation might have been, Vice President Cheney is, in effect, inviting the Obama Administration to call shenanigans on his arguments. If enhanced interrogation was unsuccessful, the Obama Administration can show it through those memos and prove to the public that Dick Cheney was wrong.

Of course, it is entirely possible that the Obama Administration is refusing to release those memos because Dick Cheney was right. If so, the Administration's refusal to take up the Cheney challenge, while self-righteously claiming that Dick Cheney is wrong, is dishonest in the extreme. And if that dishonesty translates itself into policy, it will be to the detriment of us all.

I realize that Dick Cheney is "Darth Vader," as far as the Obama Administration and its allies are concerned. But he is also an excellent debater who is able to bring well-placed facts overwhelmingly to bear in any argument. He did so against Joe Lieberman in the 2000 Vice Presidential debate. He repeated the performance in 2004, manhandling the silver-tongued John Edwards in the process. And despite the fact that I disagree with much that makes up his stance, I have to admit that he appears to have done so again. If President Obama--eloquent as he is--is unable to persuade those who are inclined to agree with him, he ought to reconsider his debating strategy.

Maybe he'll consider taking a lesson from Dick Cheney.


TOPICS: Editorial; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhodod; cheney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

1 posted on 05/21/2009 5:27:46 PM PDT by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

“Before weighing in on the split-screen showdown that occurred today in Washington, let me be clear about the views I have on the questions before us: I write as one who believes that waterboarding is counterproductive at best, and torture at worst.

And you’re writing for CBS News? Why, I’m shocked!


2 posted on 05/21/2009 5:29:36 PM PDT by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

3 posted on 05/21/2009 5:30:33 PM PDT by jessduntno (July 4th, 2009. Washington DC. Gadsden Flags. Be There.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
Judging forensics and rhetoric, it is clear that while President Obama came to make a speech, Vice President Cheney came to have a debate


4 posted on 05/21/2009 5:31:29 PM PDT by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

LOL, that’s a great picture.


5 posted on 05/21/2009 5:33:06 PM PDT by SMCC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Great article! Editorial by the Senior Editor? And CBS no less??

I’ve never been a big fan of Dick Cheney. I’ve not been a fan nor have I been a detractor. However, since he’s been able to speak as a private citizen, I have been so impressed and amazed. You go Cheney! He’s doing a great job.

Where is Bush? Last I heard of him, he congratulated Obama and said something about supporting our new Prez.

There is talk here of Cheney for President. I’ll pass on that, he’s doing too well being a spokesperson for the American people. The President cannot do that.


6 posted on 05/21/2009 5:34:31 PM PDT by ozarkgirl (I'll keep my money, my freedom and my guns. You can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMCC1
Cheney was very convincing. Even my folks, who cannot stand him, agreed. This keeps up and it will become more and more apparent that BHO is waaayyyyy over his head
7 posted on 05/21/2009 5:35:42 PM PDT by lakertaker (Libertarian Party since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl

Not a fan of Cheney? wow


8 posted on 05/21/2009 5:36:26 PM PDT by italianquaker (We went from a country that hates the president to a president that hates his country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl

You know Cheney won when even CBS News is admitting it.


9 posted on 05/21/2009 5:36:32 PM PDT by lewisglad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

And I’ll add my admiration for your picture. Geez, that’s exactly what happened after the election.

Bush in submission, Cheney with a direct head on challenge.

I love it!


10 posted on 05/21/2009 5:37:45 PM PDT by ozarkgirl (I'll keep my money, my freedom and my guns. You can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker
Not a fan of Cheney? wow

Hey, I wasn't a fan, he was just a non-entity in my mind. I'm pretty impressed now. :)

Have you always been a fan of his?

11 posted on 05/21/2009 5:41:28 PM PDT by ozarkgirl (I'll keep my money, my freedom and my guns. You can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl

Why have you never been a big fan of Dick Cheney? Your assessment of his recent performance suggests you have just discovered him.

Dick Cheney has been a consistant loyal supporter of conservativism and the Bush administration...often, with president Bush, to a fault. His loyal team-player character required his silence during the Bush years, but thankfully no longer.
He is an articulate spokesman for the values that have made America the great country it is and I am proud to have been a strong supporter of this fine man.

His address should anyone wish to send a letter:
The Hon. Dick Cheney
1126 Chain Bridge Rd
McLean, VA 22101


12 posted on 05/21/2009 5:43:26 PM PDT by Cuttnhorse (Obama...the convergence of Affirmative Action and the Peter Principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

If President Obama—eloquent as he is—is unable to persuade those who are inclined to agree with him, he ought to reconsider his debating strategy.

This is a lie. Hussain is not eloquent. He is tongue tied and inarticulate. However, he can read...and as long as he is fed lines can speak them with force.


13 posted on 05/21/2009 5:43:41 PM PDT by Chickensoup ("Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl

Cheers!

14 posted on 05/21/2009 5:47:11 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
He repeated the performance in 2004, manhandling the silver-tongued John Edwards in the process.

Manhandling is putting it lightly. Cheney destroyed Breck Girl in that debate.
15 posted on 05/21/2009 5:48:43 PM PDT by Uncle Ivan (Thompson Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl

Yes I have always liked him


16 posted on 05/21/2009 5:49:39 PM PDT by italianquaker (We went from a country that hates the president to a president that hates his country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad
Any intelligent, true conservative can beat Obama.
17 posted on 05/21/2009 5:51:09 PM PDT by ryan71 (We're in deep kimchi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

lol — awesome.


18 posted on 05/21/2009 5:52:24 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
This is a lie. Hussain is not eloquent. He is tongue tied and inarticulate. However, he can read...and as long as he is fed lines can speak them with force.

You are so right!


19 posted on 05/21/2009 5:53:10 PM PDT by Islander7 (If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

I would like to see Cheney replace Steele as the GOP spokesman


20 posted on 05/21/2009 5:53:46 PM PDT by YellowRoseofTx (Evil is not the opposite of God; it's the absence of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson