Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: garyhope

Sounds to me that the General in Afghanistan probably disagreed with Obama’s plans for more troops, and probably for suggesting going into Pakistan like Obama said he wanted to do in his campaign... I don’t know anything about the former commander in that area, all I know is that Obama can’t really stand being told he’s wrong — he believes he knows best, even if the commanders on the ground are telling him they firmly disagree. I would imagine that would get someone “sacked” in a hurry in Obama’s military...

All just my armchair opinion...


14 posted on 05/12/2009 11:56:58 PM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ ANTI-OBAMA STUFF : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: LibertyRocks

The current Commander had asked for MORE troops that zer0bama indicated would be provided.

I think that the change up was because they wanted someone who would think like Gen. Petreaus and employ new/different tactics similar to the Surge seen in Iraq. For Iraq - with 135,000 troops already there - the addition of 25,000 troops was far less significant that the tactic of clean and hold, and embed troops in the neighborhoods that they were trying to re-claim and protect.

Since the present Commander is a 4 star General, with no further assignment being considered - this means essentially a forced retirement (with 37 years of very honorable service ....nothing to snear at!)

Replacing a convential warfighter with a Special Forces experienced warfighter is probably one of the only good things that the zer0bama has done thus far.


33 posted on 05/13/2009 6:28:40 AM PDT by Vineyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: LibertyRocks

In the absense of any other info my take is that The Marxist did not want a general in Afghanistan that was not “his man”. He tried to get Gen. Patraeus out, but the man held his ground in the Senate hearings.

McKiernan was the softer target so The Usurper threw him under the bus. Given that McCrystal is now The Messiah’s man, it remains to be seen to whom his ultimate loyalties lie—America and the American soldier or the unqualified communist residing in the WH.


54 posted on 05/13/2009 8:48:50 AM PDT by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: LibertyRocks

“.........Sounds to me that the General in Afghanistan probably disagreed with Obama’s plans for more troops, and probably for suggesting going into Pakistan like Obama said he wanted to do in his campaign... I don’t know anything about the former commander in that area, all I know is that Obama can’t really stand being told he’s wrong — he believes he knows best, even if the commanders on the ground are telling him they firmly disagree. I would imagine that would get someone “sacked” in a hurry in Obama’s military...

All just my armchair opinion...”

Actually, the fired general has been yelling for mre troops...no Bambi rehabbed a liar and can manipulate him...is what happened....be afraid.....be very afraid....


65 posted on 05/13/2009 2:42:08 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: LibertyRocks
Do bear in mind General McKiernan had been asking for more US combat troops, handlers, US civilian Intel folks, NATO troops and NGO support in the way of engineering, agriculture, government experts etc., prior to Zero taking office.
In this case Zero may simply be going along with the advice of top military leaders in CENTCOM primarily, as to who could better to lead the over all effort to re-win all the gains we had made against the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan before they started to regroup. Food for thought. Remember we saw a change in top generals running OIF II (Iraq's SASO [Security and Stabilization Operation] phase). General Petreous ended up at the top.
73 posted on 05/13/2009 5:39:31 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (I still believe Duncan Hunter would have been the best solution... during this interim in time....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: LibertyRocks
All just my armchair opinion...

In that case you're more qualified than the socialist-fascist-commie pig usurper pontificating from the steamy tropical temps & opulant settings in the WH -- 0boooooomboshiite!!!

75 posted on 05/13/2009 8:19:19 PM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson