I don't think the U.S. reducing its nuclear weapons capabilities will encourage allies and "partners" (like Russia?) to cooperate with us.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: reaganaut1
“Peace Through Strength” is now “Please Be Nice to Us, We’re Unarmed.”
2 posted on
04/06/2009 5:14:31 AM PDT by
kinsman redeemer
(The real enemy seeks to devour what is good.)
To: reaganaut1
one intended to
strengthen the United States and its allies in halting proliferation.
Strength through weakness. Great.
3 posted on
04/06/2009 5:16:17 AM PDT by
bill1952
(Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
To: reaganaut1
Obama: We to abolish nuclear weapons.
Russia, Iran, North Korea, China: Yeah! You first...
4 posted on
04/06/2009 5:16:39 AM PDT by
ryan71
(TERM LIMITS!!!!)
To: reaganaut1
I didn't notice any comments from the Russian side repudiating Vladimir Putin's recent comments about basing strategic (i.e. nuclear) assets in the Caribbean Basin.
Nuclear disarmament will make China the mistress of the planet and everyone else just a bystander, including us.
To: reaganaut1
Total misdirection by The Chosen One.
Covering up weakness by diverting attention.
To: reaganaut1
"Words must mean something. So now Obama is quoting Rush Limbaugh.
7 posted on
04/06/2009 5:18:14 AM PDT by
douginthearmy
(Until I get the proper order at the drive-thru, the unemployment rate is too LOW!)
To: reaganaut1
It's Alice in Wonderland time.
Nothing this man says or does makes the slightest bit of sense. But the media nods their head and declares him brilliant.
8 posted on
04/06/2009 5:18:44 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(American Revolution II -- overdue)
To: reaganaut1
We have to kick this dangerous idiot out. It can’t be soon enough.
To: reaganaut1
You know another way to cut nuclear weapons? By having the Aegis destroyer currently in the Sea of Japan take out the missle.
But then there’d be no need for arms control agreements, happy meetings with big leather books and multiple pens that people get to keep.
Wouldn’t want to actually do something about the threat.
To: reaganaut1
The TelePrompTer President is such an embarrassment.
11 posted on
04/06/2009 5:21:28 AM PDT by
sauropod
(Welcome to O'Malleyland. What's in your wallet?)
To: reaganaut1
Rules must be binding, he said. Violations must be punished. Words must mean something. Hussein 0bama should hear himself. That is exactly why we went into Iraq and toppled the other Hussein. Hussein 0bama was against that war.
I guess it's different when you're the guy in charge.
12 posted on
04/06/2009 5:22:05 AM PDT by
Jagdgewehr
(One sword, at least, thy rights shall guard. One faithful harp shall praise thee.)
To: reaganaut1
well obama has now been tested and he has failed...this satellite rocket or missle should have been taken out while still on the pad to send a strong message...but once again the u.s. has wimped out.....
To: reaganaut1
Secret dispatch sent from the WH:
“Hey B’raq,
Look what happened! North Korea launched a long range missile and the UN can’t do squat about it! Another crisis to exploit to advance our agenda of disarming the USA! Go for it, m’ man”
Hugs to our Comrades and A’salaam to the Turks
Rahm, Dave, Greg and James
14 posted on
04/06/2009 5:22:35 AM PDT by
silverleaf
(We live in interesting times: now the entire IRS works for a tax evader)
To: reaganaut1
Enemy combatant.
The. guy. is. an. enemy. combatant.
To: reaganaut1
16 posted on
04/06/2009 5:27:00 AM PDT by
IrishMike
(Be prepared: Ammo, cash, gold, canned food. ...And more ammo.)
To: reaganaut1
He. Is. The. Absolute. Worst.
19 posted on
04/06/2009 5:30:59 AM PDT by
ought-six
( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: reaganaut1
I don't think the U.S. reducing its nuclear weapons capabilities will encourage allies and "partners" (like Russia?) to cooperate with us. If by 'cooperate' you mean 'pwn3d', then yes, were going to get cooperated. They're going to cooperate the living crap out of us.
20 posted on
04/06/2009 5:31:22 AM PDT by
Steel Wolf
(Oh, well. Back to the drawing board....)
To: reaganaut1
How Naive and dangerous of the POTUS.
While it may seem like a great idea in Academia in reality it is not only naive it's extremely dangerous.
To: reaganaut1
Sometimes I just can’t believe this guy. His response to the North Koreans launching a missile, a missile that one day may have a nuclear warhead attached, is to call for us to disarm our nuclear weapons?!! Liberal “logic” just baffles me. These weapons are a big deterrant for countries hostile do us. Does he honestly think that if we get rid of our weapons, countries who are hostile to us will lay theirs down? If anything, that gives them MORE incentive to keep their weapons and/or develop weapons because they know that we will not have the same capacity to fight back.
31 posted on
04/06/2009 6:19:06 AM PDT by
Pinkbell
To: reaganaut1
What’s the cool, hip, PC, muticultural word for putz?
32 posted on
04/06/2009 6:28:48 AM PDT by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson