To: bfree
At this point in the game, why not have another election? Rules are that for one month each contestant will have 4 debates on the issues and be able to run ads, etc. No absentee ballots and only registered voters with proper ID may vote. Winner take all.
3 posted on
04/02/2009 6:55:07 AM PDT by
Cyclone59
(You know why thereÂ’s a Second Amendment? In case the government fails to follow the first one.)
To: Cyclone59
I'd be for another election as long as NEITHER of these two can have their names on it.
Plus, I want the Iraqi "purple finger ink" voting method instituted. Anyone trying to vote twice should be shot on sight.
7 posted on
04/02/2009 6:58:04 AM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(1000110010101010100001001001111)
To: Cyclone59
why not have another election?
Minnesota election law doesn't allow for it at this time, the legislature would have to change it and it wouldn't apply to this case anyway. The recount is what the law calls for so that's what they're doing.
46 posted on
04/02/2009 10:09:55 AM PDT by
houston1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson