Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hocndoc
Federal laws may make room for the rights of conscience, but health care providers — and all those whose jobs affect patient care — should cast off the cloak of conscience when patients' needs demand it.

I wonder how such a blatant and blunt bombshell as this made the final edit.

15 posted on 03/29/2009 4:09:26 AM PDT by don-o (My son, Ben - Marine Private First Class - 1/16/09 - Parris Island, SC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: don-o

How about this complete change in the way the world works:

“As is often the case with laws touching on reproductive freedom, the debate is polarized and shrill. But there comes a point at which tolerance breaches the standard of care.”


16 posted on 03/29/2009 4:14:18 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: don-o

For years, the “bioethicists” have been telling us that conscience is just another personally held belief that gets in the way of what they want us to do.

The irony, as Mad Dawg has pointed out, is that the author puts on a moral, “right thing,” “ought” argument, herself.

We “ought” to do something — but what is the basis of “ought”?

Law? law varies by region, local preferences and customs, and sometimes by the whim of a dictator, someone with a gun or an oligarchy representing itself as the judiciary.


17 posted on 03/29/2009 4:18:51 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.LifeEthics.org (I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson