Where exactly is the threat? He pretty much just called Obama a criminal but didn’t threaten him directly in any way. How many liberals said much worse about President Bush?
Not just said, are still saying, and still pushing for criminal prosecution of President Bush and others in his administration.
I only see truth.
Or indirectly or any other way. Prepare for defense, legal and self. This is a test case, I think. If it doesn't get a loud and effective response there will be more. Then they won't be test cases anymore.
My thoughts are along the same line as yours. The stupid liberals made all the threats that they wanted and President Bush let it slide, yet we speak against ZERO and he sends the Secret Service after us!
“Where exactly is the threat? He pretty much just called Obama a criminal but didn’t threaten him directly in any way. How many liberals said much worse about President Bush?”
What is the highest punishment for treason?
How many? Tooooo MANY - but President Bush was a man. BO is a puppet and a paranoid child.
Gotta follow the commie logic. Anything that threatens The Marxist Onada—either physically or politically—is a threat. It is simply inconceivable to the left that anyone would even want to unseat The Messiah. Thus, those opposing Him are either a criminal or criminally insane.
One of the greatest miracles of our democracy is the near absolute freedom from coercion by the military civilian leaders enjoy. Our top military leaders are acutely aware of the danger of “Bonapartism” and take pains to drill the notion of subordination to civilian authority into the officers of our armed forces.
I know people who came here from countries where the army picks the president and it really sucks.
Of course, there are implicit concomitant obligations of civilian leaders to respect the sacrifices of the military and the rights of private citizens. These are obligations of which 0bama seems serenely unaware.