Skip to comments.
Critics: Proposed Ga. law amounts to a poll tax
Google ^
| 03/13/2009
| KATE BRUMBACK
Posted on 03/13/2009 1:36:10 PM PDT by FreeAtlanta
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: FreeAtlanta
Is this different than the Photo ID Law required by Georgia?
21
posted on
03/13/2009 1:54:05 PM PDT
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: FreeAtlanta
It's been more than 40 years since the Voting Rights Act was signed, barring voting practices used throughout the Southby democrats for years to keep poor blacks from voting. I get so tired of that part being misrepresented.
22
posted on
03/13/2009 1:55:00 PM PDT
by
infidel29
(2008, a year I'd like to forget)
To: FreeAtlanta
You mean Georgia wants to pass a law requiring people to prove that they are legally eligible to vote? A deliberate attempt to make election fraud more difficult??!! WHY THE BA$TARD$!!!
23
posted on
03/13/2009 1:58:39 PM PDT
by
Oldpuppymax
(AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
That’s exactly the way it’s done.
For a party that’s supposed to be “inclusive” the dems sure malign their voters - the poor, minorities, and the elderly can’t produce proof of citizenship? Well, unless they’re not citizens they should be able to provide proof. What are they - helpless and clueless?
I know the real plan is to get as many illegal votes as possible, but in the process the dems are sending the message that only a select few people are competent and everyone else is a dolt. Why on earth don’t the rank-and-file democrats revolt against this?
24
posted on
03/13/2009 1:59:18 PM PDT
by
ElayneJ
To: FreeAtlanta
A proposed Georgia law would require prospective voters to prove citizenship, a practice opponents say would keep the poor, elderly and minorities away from the polls as taxes and literacy tests once did.How do they collect their welfare and other gov't services? How do they cash checks?
25
posted on
03/13/2009 2:05:40 PM PDT
by
umgud
(I'm really happy I wasn't aborted)
To: HoosierHawk
Can some one explain this to me. Not am explanation, per se, but an alternative idea. First here is what the 24th Amendment says, in part:
Poll Tax Barred. Ratified 1/23/1964. History
1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.
Here is what we do:
Charge a $100.00 fee for entry to a polling station. We then wave the fee for anyone who submits proof that they are a citizen.
We are in compliance with the above 24th Amendment, then correct?
Seriously though, if voting rights are not limited to US Citizens, why then are US Citizens specifically mentioned in the 24th Amendment?
The guy quoted in your post is wrong.
26
posted on
03/13/2009 2:05:52 PM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
("They're not Americans. They're liberals! "-- Ann Coulter, May 15, 2008)
To: FreeAtlanta
Maybe every voter should get a voucher for a Drivers License?
27
posted on
03/13/2009 2:09:41 PM PDT
by
Madistan
((This space for rent))
To: FreeAtlanta
I can think of one member of a minority group who would be prevented from voting under this rule.
28
posted on
03/13/2009 2:11:18 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(May God have mercy on our souls. ~ Þ)
To: FreeAtlanta
Acorn has been hired to take care of the poor and elderly. They can take them to the polls or anywhere else they need to go.
29
posted on
03/13/2009 2:33:07 PM PDT
by
devistate one four
(Impatiently waiting for the next tea party! Tet '68)
To: FreeAtlanta
A proposed Georgia law would require prospective voters to prove citizenship, a practice opponents say would keep the poor, elderly and minorities ACORN constituents away from the polls as taxes and literacy tests good common sense once did.
30
posted on
03/13/2009 2:34:51 PM PDT
by
fwdude
("...a 'centrist' ... has few principles - and those are negotiable." - Don Feder)
To: 2harddrive
Are you telling me that minorities and the poor can’t dance? I thought only rich white guys couldn’t dance.
31
posted on
03/13/2009 2:55:45 PM PDT
by
rbbeachkid
(The ONLY ones able to fix the economy - Small Business Owners!)
To: Michael.SF.
32
posted on
03/13/2009 3:02:37 PM PDT
by
HoosierHawk
(Democrats - Looting American citizens for generations to come.)
To: HoosierHawk
This may help explain Prof. Kang:
As Emory Law associate professor Michael Kang teaches his course this fall election law, he can't help reflecting on the influence of a similar class he took as a student at the University of Chicago Law Schooltaught by Barack Obama.
Kang was one of a dozen students in the fall of 1998 enrolled in Obama's course titled "Constitutional Law: Equal Protection and Due Process." ...
Kangs research focuses on voting rights, race, redistricting, campaign finance and direct democracy.
Source; http://www.emory.edu/home/news/releases/2008/09/teacher-learned-in-obama-classroom.html
33
posted on
03/13/2009 3:47:39 PM PDT
by
dorothy
(We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst.” —C.S. Lewis)
To: CurlyDave
"Lets just rephrase this and say if they cant find their birth certificate, they cant vote."
I wish all states would require proper ID for voting. Don't the poor have to show some proof when they receive thier welfare, clothing allowance, medicaid etc? It does not have to be a birth cetificate... it can be legal government document of some kind. I don't have a birth certificate and never had one, being as I was not born here in the U.S. I had to go through hoops to prove I am who I say I am... Citizenship papers helped to get drivers licence & passport. So, if the poor and minorities don't have any id... how the heck do they get welfare funds?
34
posted on
03/13/2009 4:17:51 PM PDT
by
Strutt9
To: dorothy
35
posted on
03/13/2009 5:16:18 PM PDT
by
HoosierHawk
(Democrats - Looting American citizens for generations to come.)
To: rbbeachkid
36
posted on
03/13/2009 8:33:36 PM PDT
by
2harddrive
(...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
To: Michael.SF.
I’m not an attorney, but my guess is they would say that what you have posted says that citizens can’t be prevented from voting. It doesn’t say that non-citizens can’t vote...
37
posted on
03/14/2009 5:54:31 AM PDT
by
canaan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson