[SteamShovel]

Remember, this is not just a few scientists who are spewing this lie—it is the best and brightest, the most prestigious scientific publications, etc.

I take issue with the "best and brightest" comment.

If they are putting politics in front of true science (facts pure and simple), they are neither scientists nor very bright.

When said "most prestigious scientific publications" are run by said "best and brightest" who are not, then the publications cease to be the most prestigious". They become political junkmail.

[HwyChile]

Look. If you named off the most prestigious scientific publicans (name them all) and they are backing global warming and the top scientists (including NASA scientists) are backing global warming, that is the top of the science community. If the very top is this corrupt in this day and age, then how could anyone believe anything that science says? That is what convinced me. Plus I have a very solid understanding of the history of science (I researched it and wrote a big paper on it in college) that science is not objective and not reliable. If you really look at the history of science, it has always been corrupt and non-objective.