Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US lines up billions for Pakistan, ignoring terror links
The Times of India ^ | 26 Feb., 2009 | The Times of India

Posted on 02/26/2009 5:29:15 AM PST by MyTwoCopperCoins

WASHINGTON: The United States is lining up billions of dollars in new economic and military aid to Pakistan despite reports that Islamabad is using American tax-payer money for deals with the Taliban and accounts of US arms ending up in the hands of the extremists.

Amid an ongoing review of the so-called Af-Pak policy initiated by the Obama administration, Washington, under pressure from influential Senator John Kerry among other lawmakers and lobbyists, is said to be considering a one-time $ 5 billion aid to Pakistan over and above the $ 1.5 billion annual package for ten years currently under review for passage through Congress.

Releasing a report by the think-tank Atlantic Council on Wednesday, Kerry, who is also the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and is in a position to pilot the aid package, raised the prospect of a total collapse in Pakistan if it was not helped urgently.

"If we fail, we face a truly frightening prospect: terrorist sanctuary, economic meltdown, and spiraling radicalism, all in a nation with 170 million inhabitants and a full arsenal of nuclear weapons," he said. "The stakes could not be higher, and [this] report could not be more timely."

The 27-page report calls for "a total of $4-5 billion above the (Biden)-Kerry-Lugar proposals and beyond the IMF and other loans from the US. and other sources," for Pakistan. Of this, it recommends, about $3 billion should go to the economic and social sectors directly. About $1 billion of fresh or redirected funds would go to security forces -- both military and law enforcement.

US government reports in recent times have detailed how Pakistan has misused billions in aid for a military build-up against India instead of using it for the intended war on terror. Audits have also detailed million of dollars in fraudulent claims by the Pakistani military. Reimbursement to Pakistan have been halted for several minths because of this but are set to resume soon after the Obama administration has given a green signal pending further audits.

More recent accounts from Pakistan have described how high end US military equipment is ending up with extremists through arms bazaars in the country's frontier. Earlier this week, reports from Pakistan detailed $ 6 million paid through back channels to the Taliban in the latest truce in Swat with more in the pipeline.

Reports of enhanced American aid to a suspect ally at a time of economic woes in the US has caused consternation in strategic circles.

"Not only is the United States paying the Pakistani government to abdicate territory to the Taliban, we get to fund the Taliban as well," said Bill Roggio, an expert in the war on terror, questioning the Kerry-Lugar proposal aimed to tripling military aid to Pakistan.

"It's time for the US. government to ask if it is getting a good return on its investment. Considering that more than $3.8 billion of $5 billion of US. aid to Pakistan has gone unaccounted for and the Taliban is being funded by the US, perhaps the answer is no," Roggio, who runs the blog Long War Journal, added.

Kerry made no mention of any Pakistani transgression in his alarming presentation as he pushed for increased aid amid intense Pakistani lobbying in Washington. Pakistan's foreign minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi, its Army chief Pervez Ashraf Kiyani, and the ISI Director-General Shuja Pasha have been in intense consultations with US interlocutors this week to seek a bail-out for Islsmabad, warning that a meltdown in Pakistan can affect the neighborhood and the whole world.

Although the Atlantic Council report has several recommendations to temper Pakistan's militaristic outlook, its embrace of extremism, and the need to promote peace with India, the proposed aid is not contingent on Islamabad living up to any benchmarks.

The report largely glosses over the Mumbai attack, in which 159 people including six Americans died, while empathizing with Islamabad for its predicament in initiating action against those who plotted the carnage.

"Pakistan must clearly do more to neutralize and control terrorist organizations operating on its soil and hence must meet some demands it believes are harsh and too biased towards Indian preferences," it says on the Mumbai attack, but adds, "Giving Pakistan leeway to do so on its own timetable may be a way out and prevent the government from being seen as doing so at India's bidding."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aidandcomfort; india; islam; muslim; pakistan

1 posted on 02/26/2009 5:29:16 AM PST by MyTwoCopperCoins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins
Wow, in addition to $900M for Hamas in Gaza, we're also funding the Taliban! When do we start funding Iran and North Korea?!

Makes one so eager to pay taxes!

2 posted on 02/26/2009 5:32:18 AM PST by DTogo (Time to bring back the Sons of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

Sure, fund the people that are fighting our soldiers, that makes a whole lot of sense.

These people are dangerous.


3 posted on 02/26/2009 5:34:14 AM PST by luv2ndamend (May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. — Samue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

Letting Pak collapse into 4-5 independent stans is the best outcome. Riven by ethnic divisions, these stans will squabble, rely on external support and occupy themselves there.

Pak’s collapse would be the best, hardest and most irrecoverable blow to terrorism the world has seen in a long time.


4 posted on 02/26/2009 5:36:03 AM PST by voletti (There's no place, I can be, since I found, serenity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

I guarantee that the MSM will NEVER show this! If the American public would wake the HECK up....people, these morons in office have a few things in mind:
-Destroy this country
-Take the wealth and power

At some point we need to uphold the Constitution!


5 posted on 02/26/2009 5:37:27 AM PST by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

Un-freaking-believable.


6 posted on 02/26/2009 5:48:42 AM PST by villagerjoel ("Gun control is a prerequisite for genocide." - Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

I’m leaning toward the “fix what Ghandi couldn’t” or didn’t want too. I’m not big on genocide, but if it weren’t for nuc’s India could pretty much take care of the Pakistan problem. By giving up on a free India and allowing the Muslim’s to start up Pakistan, the “problem” got a giant generational shift.

Now we have an interesting balance of power problem coupled with the Taliban running a good portion of Pakistan, while India gets hammered in a terrorist attack, and just can’t wait for the next one.


7 posted on 02/26/2009 5:48:58 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voletti

I think we are on the same page.


8 posted on 02/26/2009 5:52:06 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

“Makes one so eager to pay taxes!”

Daschle style.


9 posted on 02/26/2009 5:59:25 AM PST by villagerjoel ("Gun control is a prerequisite for genocide." - Unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: voletti
"Letting Pak collapse into 4-5 independent stans is the best outcome. Riven by ethnic divisions, these stans will squabble, rely on external support and occupy themselves there.

"Pak’s collapse would be the best, hardest and most irrecoverable blow to terrorism the world has seen in a long time.

I agree, but only if the nukes can be extracted.

10 posted on 02/26/2009 6:26:31 AM PST by cookcounty ("We'll post bills on the internet........", --excerpt from the Vast Collection of Obama Lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

The Taliban and Alqaeda


11 posted on 02/26/2009 6:36:28 AM PST by Cronos (Ceterum censeo, Mecca et Medina delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

May as well just send them missiles, bombs, poisonous agents and instruction manuals.
Madness!


12 posted on 02/26/2009 6:39:06 AM PST by Leftism is Mentally Deranged (liberalism is truly evil. and liberals have no sense of humor either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leftism is Mentally Deranged

That;s our boy Bama.

Who said he isnt Muslim.?


13 posted on 02/26/2009 7:02:12 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

A few billion here, a few billion there. Who keeps count? Certainly not Geithner. He can’t even do TurboTax.


14 posted on 02/26/2009 7:14:30 AM PST by Malesherbes (Sauve Qui Peut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Those billions are going to end up killing our guys in Afghanistan.


15 posted on 02/26/2009 7:31:37 AM PST by ponygirl (Obama: All beans, no weiner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

>>”Not only is the United States paying the Pakistani government to abdicate territory to the Taliban, we get to fund the Taliban as well,” said Bill Roggio,

Roggio is sounding more like an Indian than even the majors and colonels of the US Army stationed in Afghania, lol.


16 posted on 02/26/2009 12:26:14 PM PST by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTogo

http://laotze.blogspot.com/2007/07/pakistan-not-safe-for-democracy-on-4th.html


17 posted on 02/26/2009 12:56:05 PM PST by expatguy (Support "An American Expat in Southeast Asia" - DONATE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy

>>Roggio is sounding more like an Indian than even the majors and colonels of the US Army stationed in Afghania, lol.

Maybe, maybe not.

Its no secret what the basic premise of NATO policy seems to be in that region.

And it is that terrorism is terrorism only when western targets are hit, and when Indian targets are hot, oh, it must be some regional differences like Kashmir.

Baloney.

Apart from rank hypocrisy against a fellow secular-pluralistic-giant democracy, its self-defeating in the long run.

NATO is allowing a monster to grow in the region by not strangling the Pak army-ISI nexus that directly feeds and the Taliban/Al Qaeda jihadists.

I repeat, ‘Give peace a chance, destroy Pakistan’. Rather, allow it to commit (assisted) suicide. Withdraw all life-support such as emergency aid etc. Then see how long they last.


18 posted on 02/26/2009 6:25:49 PM PST by voletti (There's no place, I can be, since I found, serenity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MyTwoCopperCoins

We already funnel billions into saudi arabia and a large chunk of that goes to terrorist support so why not just cut out the oil fields and dump cash right in their laps?

It’ll save us money in the long run.


19 posted on 02/26/2009 6:28:48 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voletti

>>its self-defeating in the long run.

Well, yes, that’s what I mean, but, the key is not Afghania but Pakistan, where things are nicely simmering.

Hey, I’m an optimist. I want Pakistan like an icecream cone melting in the summer sun.

Which, inshallah, it is doing rather swimmingly right now.

>>>Indian targets

Yes, of course, like the Bombay 2006 Train Attacks, hardly mentioned by anyone even when referring to London, Madrid, etc.


20 posted on 02/27/2009 11:33:23 AM PST by swarthyguy ("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson