Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEDERAL COORDINATING COUNCIL FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS (health provision struck out?)
The Library of Congress - Thomas website ^ | 2/11/2009 | United States Congress

Posted on 02/11/2009 8:22:56 PM PST by Claud

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
It seems the ridiculous health care provisions Betsy McCaughey uncovered have been struck out of what looks to be the latest version of the Porkulus bill.

That's how I read this anyway....anyone care to verify? If the link above doesn't work, go to Thomas:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.1:

and look at Version 7 of H.R. 1....section 9201 has been struck out. Hopefully never to rise again.

Mods, apologies if the link is screwed up...Thomas has a strange interface and links seem to expire.

1 posted on 02/11/2009 8:22:56 PM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Claud

just the title was struck out?


2 posted on 02/11/2009 8:24:36 PM PST by GeronL (please stand by...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

No the whole section apparently.

Let’s see if this link is any better (stupid cgi):

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.1.PP:

Scroll down to sec. 9201.


3 posted on 02/11/2009 8:26:55 PM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Claud

I would hope changing the title wouldn’t fool anyone


4 posted on 02/11/2009 8:31:18 PM PST by GeronL (please stand by...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Claud

Grr...ok. Go to the main page:

http://thomas.loc.gov/

Click on HR 1 at the top of the page in red. Then click on “Text of Legislation”, then version 7, at which point scroll down to 9201 and then click on that to see all the language that was struck out.

Whew!


5 posted on 02/11/2009 8:31:51 PM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Claud

Is so, THANK YOU Ms. McCaughey! She was tireless in sounding the alarm on this. I think she hit every talk radio show in America.


6 posted on 02/11/2009 8:32:34 PM PST by fullchroma (I want my country back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud

...or as our local radio host called it FCCCER. (say it in your head)

(Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research)


7 posted on 02/11/2009 8:37:11 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

LOL....that’s good!

I’m skimming through the rest of this bill and there’s a huge new section on health care (I shoulda guessed)....hopefully Ms. McCaughey will be all over this new section as well. I can’t make sense of it...I’m just a lowly editor and it’s way past my bedtime. :)


8 posted on 02/11/2009 8:44:53 PM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Claud

Maybe they will just keep moving it around, figuring Betsy needs to sleep SOMETIME!


9 posted on 02/11/2009 8:46:35 PM PST by Wisconsinlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I would hope changing the title wouldn’t fool anyone

It works quite well, actually, which is why they do it so often. Just call anything "The Fairness In blah, blah, blah" and it's a sure winner among the sheeple.

10 posted on 02/11/2009 9:09:08 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (The committed will surely dominate the complacent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wisconsinlady

Moving it around Hmmm... Sure looks like they added a few $$s. I thought the original amount of funding was around $1.2 billion. Now it is showing $3 billion. They are just trying to get a little stealthy. They also have added what appears to be privacy protection. Now that is a hoot! WOW a $100 dollar fine for each incident not to surpass $25,000 for a single year. So lets see, Big Pharma or Big Insurance pays a donates a million bucks to some hospital they release information on a couple thousand people said entity pays no more than a $25k fine and no one gets prosecuted. Sound like a plan to me. Plus if you want to challenge on the records being released the entity can charge you for labor related expenditures. Nurse initials $25, super nurses initials $50, Docs initials $200, Administrative fees $500 and legal $500. Hell at $20 an aspirin this could be in the ballpark. Then again my estimates could be way to low.


11 posted on 02/11/2009 9:54:59 PM PST by nd2bfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Claud
Check this out! Buy American is still in there.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c111:7:./temp/~c111v2ZgSH:e1540583:

buy american Sec. 1604. Use of American Iron, Steel, and Manufactured Goods. (a) None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used for a project for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public building or public work unless all of the iron, steel, and manufactured goods used in the project are produced in the United States. (b) Subsection (a) shall not apply in any case in which the head of the Federal department or agency involved finds that-- (1) applying subsection (a) would be inconsistent with the public interest; (2) iron, steel, and the relevant manufactured goods are not produced in the United States if sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory quality; or (3) inclusion of iron, steel, and manufactured goods produced in the United States will increase the cost of the overall project by more than 25 percent. (c) If the head of a Federal department or agency determines that it is necessary to waive the application of subsection (a) based on a finding under subsection (b), the head of the department or agency shall publish in the Federal Register a detailed written jurisdiction as to why the provision is being waived. (d) This section shall be applied in a manner consistent with United States obligations under international agreements.
12 posted on 02/11/2009 10:15:22 PM PST by Danae (Amerikan Unity My Ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud

I can’t translate Bafflegab, Gobbledegook, or Bureacratese, but I’d bet anything that the FEDERAL POWER TO MURDER is still in there—just with the most intelligible scary language struck out.


13 posted on 02/11/2009 10:43:31 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sloop
ping
14 posted on 02/11/2009 10:54:58 PM PST by sloop (pfc in the quiet civil war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:h1eas.txt.pdf

H.R.1
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Engrossed Amendment as Agreed to by Senate)

You are correct the entire 9XXX sections were struck from the bill as passed by the Senate.

The version passed by the House DOES have the 9XXX sections in it. http://thomas.loc.gov/home/gpoxmlc111/h1_eh.xml <—takes a long time to load.


15 posted on 02/11/2009 10:58:58 PM PST by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Claud
I hope it's out!

You know, on top of everything else I am more comfortable with Republicans in office because if a Republican tries something even a little questionable the media are all over it.

Imagine the coverage if Bush had done something even remotely like this. Remember how hos Social Security plans were skewered?

16 posted on 02/12/2009 2:37:30 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

Just call anything “The Fairness In blah, blah, blah”

the Fair Tax


17 posted on 02/12/2009 3:05:49 AM PST by Son House (Limbaugh's Bipartisan Economic Stimulus Plan is offering Mr. Øbama an OUT from terrible legislation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

I think this is the compromise version...but I’m not sure.


18 posted on 02/12/2009 3:52:58 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Danae

Hm. Good find....the plot thickens!


19 posted on 02/12/2009 3:55:25 AM PST by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nd2bfree

Specter said he absolutely would not vote for this bill if it had anything changing our medical care in it. A couple of dems said the same thing.

Get the word out!


20 posted on 02/12/2009 4:18:58 AM PST by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson