Skip to comments.
Obama’s cap on CEO pay strives to end era of excess
Christian Science Monitor ^
| February 4, 2009
| By Mark Trumbull
Posted on 02/04/2009 11:23:21 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Beware of the media-political complex.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The Board of Directors sets compensation. If the major shareholders found it to be “excessive” then the Board would withhold approval.
2
posted on
02/04/2009 11:26:36 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(Mornie` utulie`. Mornie` alantie`.)
To: BenLurkin
“The Board of Directors sets compensation. If the major shareholders found it to be excessive then the Board would withhold approval.”
Provided you don’t take taxpayer’s money. When you beg for a handout, the rules change.
3
posted on
02/04/2009 11:28:23 AM PST
by
brownsfan
(We are sooooo screwed.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Top bankers convinced the world that they were the smartest human beings on the face of the earth
. It turns out they werent all that smart. He did hit a home run with that one, but they still have the loot?
5
posted on
02/04/2009 11:30:56 AM PST
by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
To: wiseprince
Bad precedent Bad president, too.
6
posted on
02/04/2009 11:31:06 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
To: brownsfan
Exactly - note to self: Don’t take TARP or any other federal assistance with strings, because the strings will f*** you up, sooner or later.
To: wiseprince
Good grief, a $500K on annual pay. No mention of stock options, etc. That will be easy to get around.
8
posted on
02/04/2009 11:31:21 AM PST
by
VA_Gentleman
(I will not vote for the GOP until they show some spine.)
To: wiseprince
Not to worry, their pay will be going down anyway because the banks will fail.
9
posted on
02/04/2009 11:31:35 AM PST
by
refermech
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I knew this was coming, and in a certain sense these guys brought it on themselves but still its a terrible precedent and deeply disturbing.
10
posted on
02/04/2009 11:32:15 AM PST
by
Pietro
To: brownsfan
Really?
Who makes the rules?
11
posted on
02/04/2009 11:32:52 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(Mornie` utulie`. Mornie` alantie`.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Am I right in that it was perfectly okay for these guys to give money to obama and contribute to his inauguration, but not okay to pay themselves a bonus?
To: org.whodat; Wally_Kalbacken
Goldman announced that they’ll return their TARP money....others to follow. Good deal if you and your employer are cash rich....not so good if you want a loan.
13
posted on
02/04/2009 11:34:53 AM PST
by
byteback
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I don't like the fact that incompetent bankers were rewarded for screwing up, but this is a terrible idea. How long before the government decides what everyone can make, not just executives? This is un-American, period.
14
posted on
02/04/2009 11:35:03 AM PST
by
Major Matt Mason
(The Kenyan Keynesian will bankrupt this nation.)
To: wiseprince
Will this administration put a cap on salaries and expense accounts for the following executives:
UNION LEADERS who benefited from the auto bailout?
SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS who stand to benefit from the “stimulus”?
LEGISLATORS who receive State bail out funds?
ENVIORNMENTALISTS who receive “stimulus” money to study the green toed frog?
15
posted on
02/04/2009 11:35:59 AM PST
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
How much is a good pitcher worth nowadays, a quarter back, a singer with a BIG nose? Makes ya feel real good, don’t it?
16
posted on
02/04/2009 11:36:22 AM PST
by
Waco
To: BenLurkin
Who makes the rules? The same kind people who made rules that allow corporations. And according to the constitution they have the legal authority to change those rules.
17
posted on
02/04/2009 11:38:02 AM PST
by
org.whodat
(Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
To: jennyjenny
Am I right in that it was perfectly okay for these guys to give money to obama and contribute to his inauguration, but not okay to pay themselves a bonus? You nailed it! This guy is dangerous. He's ringing in socialism in faster than I thought he would. Joe the Plumber had it 100% right.
To: Pietro
only the beginning of a long-term effort
Remember Obama there is no ‘golden handcuffs’ to keep talented executives at these companies. Those preferred stocks the taxpayer now holds could end up junk.
19
posted on
02/04/2009 11:38:53 AM PST
by
griswold3
(a good story is more compelling than the search for truth)
To: BenLurkin
Who makes the rules? He who has the gold, makes the rules.
And, he who has the guns, has all the gold he wants.
20
posted on
02/04/2009 11:38:53 AM PST
by
thulldud
(All your rumor are mong to us.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson