Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/31/2009 7:28:01 AM PST by ronnyquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ronnyquest
Nah, this has been around for years (talking about civilians accompanying the military on operations).
2 posted on 01/31/2009 7:31:11 AM PST by markomalley (Extra ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ronnyquest

ONe Military sworn to defend the Constitution.

One Military sworn to defend ......... ADOLF HITLER

Are their shirts going to be Brown, RED, or Hussein BLUE??

Got to admit tho .. the HUSSEIN CIRCLE is much more asthetically pleasing than the SWASTIKA.

GOD HELP US ALL!!


3 posted on 01/31/2009 7:31:23 AM PST by gwilhelm56 (MULLAH HUSSEIN - which part of "Congress shall make no Law" - do you NOT UNDERSTAND??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ronnyquest
Expeditionary forces are deployed outside of the US. This is not anything like the Brown Shirts of Nazi Germany...more like the Peace Corps on steroids.

Congress will have to pass a law over-ruling posse comitatus before they can deploy military within the US.

Not time to worry...yet.
4 posted on 01/31/2009 7:35:36 AM PST by Sudetenland (Those diplomats serve best, who serve as cannon fodder to protect our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ronnyquest
Could be:

4. POLICY. It is DoD policy to:

a. Rely on a mix of capable military members and DoD civilian employees to meet DoD global national security mission requirements. DoD civilian employees are an integral part of the Total Force. They serve in a variety of positions, provide essential capabilities and, where appropriate for civilians to do so, support mission requirements such as combat, contingencies, emergency operations; humanitarian and civic assistance activities; disaster relief; restoration of order; drug interdiction; and stability operations of the Department of Defense, herein collectively referred to as “expeditionary requirements.”

5 posted on 01/31/2009 7:37:25 AM PST by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ronnyquest
Here's a previous version http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/blaw/dodd/corres/pdf/d140410_041092/d140410p.pdf. I haven't compared the two version to see what was changed.

It looks like it is just the rules for deploying civilian DoD employee to unpleasant places. Congratulations, bureaucrat, your paper handling skills are needed in Baghdad.

6 posted on 01/31/2009 7:39:49 AM PST by KarlInOhio (On 9/11 Israel mourned with us while the Palestinians danced in the streets. Who should we support?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ronnyquest
he's not wasting any time in getting his private army up and running

“c. Supersedes any conflicting portions of other DoD issuances...

“employees to meet DoD
global national security mission requirements.”

“SUPERCEDES”? the military?

“GLOBAL” - in line with the UN dictates ready to implement, taking away our National Sovereignty and putting the U.S. AND out military under the UN - which is run by every podunk little dictator country...and the UN will take your guns...

Don't say he didn't warn you. Don't say we didn't try to spread this...if you were breathing, you have no excuse not to have heard this and spread the word.

Hear it in his own words. The only thing we have left to ask now is: “Will his private army wear brown shirts or ‘bama blue?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Df2p6867_pw

and if that doesn't strike a bell, maybe this one will

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xCujfg5w5w&feature=related Any guesses as to just who will make up the vast majority of that army of 600,000? I think there are going to be a lot of Rats in DC that are also going to wake up - too late - to find they've been had...the new regime is not going to be led by them. They have merely served as usefull idiots as a means to the end. Who will really be in power? dare one say it?

8 posted on 01/31/2009 7:53:19 AM PST by maine-iac7 ("He has the right to criticize who has the heart to help" Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ronnyquest
Is this where Chairman Obama's mysterious 600,000 new jobs will be created? Does this remind anyone else of Germany in the first half of the 20th Century? Are we going to see brown shirts and black armbands in the near future?

"No", "no", and "who knows".

Lots of DoD civilian employees are deployed to war zones and they are NOT paper pushers or Obama lackeys.

Quite the contrary, they deserve your respect as much as any uniformed warfighter, because they serve in and support exactly the same mission.

How would you like if your boss said "I need volunteers to [survey, validate, audit] our [munitions, arms, billeting, security] in [Iraq, Afghanistan] for three months, and you're it. You'll be on the move constantly around the country and you'll always be in combat zones, so you can request a personal firearm if you choose."

As a contractor I deployed and redeployed with dozens of DoD civilian employees right along with the reservists and National Guard.

The DoD civvies didn't get paid much, they didn't have any real choice to go or not, and they were sent out to open combat operations constantly.

By the way, the DoD Directive above seems merely to update codify laws and procedures pertaining to the DoD civilian workforce.

I see nothing inherently sinister or worrisome about it.

10 posted on 01/31/2009 8:00:07 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ronnyquest

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwaAVJITx1Y&feature=related

when will it be time to worry???


35 posted on 01/31/2009 10:40:15 AM PST by maine-iac7 ("He has the right to criticize who has the heart to help" Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson