Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama has struck all pending eligibility cases OFF SCOTUS docket
plains radio ^

Posted on 01/22/2009 7:01:08 AM PST by dascallie

How is this possible? Orly Taitz has a scheduled conference hearing for Jan23, by Justice Roberts...it has disappeared from the docket.

posted by Shestheone

IP: 72.224.141.133

Jan 22nd, 2009 - 7:38 AM Re: America's finest ! Dr Orly Taitz- Just sent lots of subpeona 's out _ I hope she sees my future

Ah, but her cases are no longer on the docket - bo has struck. All elgibility cases have disappeared. Please call and write to our Supreme Court and demand that they put the elgibility cases back on the docket. Visit scotusblog.feedback@gmail.com too and leave feedback.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911truthers; birthcertifigate; birthers; blackhelicopters; certifigate; constitution; coverup; dictatorship; eligibility; fear; fearthis; judicialtyranny; scotus; tinfoilhats; tyrants
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-200 next last

1 posted on 01/22/2009 7:01:08 AM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dascallie
I would think that the separation of powers clauses in the Constitution would prevent any President from having any power to do something like this.

I am dubious of the claim that it was Obama's doing.

Now....does anyone know the whereabouts of Sandy Burger?

2 posted on 01/22/2009 7:04:32 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (All the oil's in Texas...but all the dipsticks are in Washington, DC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

How can he do that? I thought SCOTUS was part of a check and balance system. I am going to have to stop coming to FreeRepublic...my blood pressure is going through the roof with what is being uncovered already about this administration.


3 posted on 01/22/2009 7:04:55 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

I don’t believe the President has the power to do that. Separation of powers...

I think it’s more likely the Supreme Court decided the point was now moot, since Obama has been sworn in. Twice.


4 posted on 01/22/2009 7:05:53 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (Go, Sonics! And take the Seahawks with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

“Pssst, Roberts? You can have a do-over if you wipe that docket for me. Deal?”


5 posted on 01/22/2009 7:05:56 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle

Ah, but it is not moot. Does not matter if he is sworn in, this question is still viable.


6 posted on 01/22/2009 7:07:55 AM PST by waxer1 ( Live Free or Die; Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Well, perhaps not him directly, but rather someone acting on his behalf. Doesn’t the Clerk take care of that sorta thing?

I knew about Orly’s case being scrubbed, but ALL of them?!
How many were in the bullpen?


7 posted on 01/22/2009 7:08:19 AM PST by ozark hilljilly (Ignorant, pushy noob since 4/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

Is this still Silly Season? Because, this is silly.


8 posted on 01/22/2009 7:08:27 AM PST by savedbygrace (You are only leading if someone follows. Otherwise, you just wandered off... [Smokin' Joe])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

maybe the person(s) handling the website made them disappear? ...accidently....


9 posted on 01/22/2009 7:08:27 AM PST by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

Does Bambi have the authority to do this or was this done by someone on the USSC?


10 posted on 01/22/2009 7:09:27 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace

Did you bring your flame suit? Because you are really asking for it. You’d better off bringing a pig to Mecca than doubting the birth certificate conspiracy on the FR.


11 posted on 01/22/2009 7:11:16 AM PST by Seruzawa (Obamalama lied, the republic died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

Don’t know if this is factual stuff or not, but if so it just goes to show how far a thug can go with a conspiratorial media and a fat, dumb, lazy public.


12 posted on 01/22/2009 7:12:17 AM PST by Oldpuppymax (AGENDA OF THE LEFT EXPOSED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie
Thats simply not possible.

Don't buy into the hype, the guy can't walk on water, nor can he do something like this..

13 posted on 01/22/2009 7:12:47 AM PST by Paradox (When the left have no one to villainize, they'll turn on each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

Berg’s case is still listed but it was updated yesterday:

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

Jan 21 2009 Application (08A505) denied by the Court.


14 posted on 01/22/2009 7:12:54 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie
They don't want to "thwart the will of the people" by applying unreasonable eligibility requirements from some old, out of fashion document written by long dead racist white guys.

/sarcasm off/


15 posted on 01/22/2009 7:12:56 AM PST by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

What was Taitz’s original docket number? I can’t even find where anything was filed with her name in it.


16 posted on 01/22/2009 7:14:14 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waxer1

If the court decided it’s moot, then it’s moot. They decide which cases they’re going to take, not us.


17 posted on 01/22/2009 7:14:16 AM PST by Not A Snowbird (Go, Sonics! And take the Seahawks with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

That is a denied case. This refers to cases pending or scheduled for conference


18 posted on 01/22/2009 7:14:53 AM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dascallie
Obama's eligibility question has been rendered moot by the fact that he has been sworn into the office. The only way to remove him now is by the process of impeachment.

Even if the courts decided today he was not legally eligible, they do not have the power to remove him from office. Only the Senate has that power and they only have that power if presented with a bill of impeachment from the house.

It is out of the hands of any court at this point.

19 posted on 01/22/2009 7:14:53 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dascallie

I do wish you wouldn’t state in the title that Zobama had the cases dropped.

I odn’t know any more than you why the cases were dropped.
I assume that there is no judicial relief now.

A suit challenging a law signed by him is in order now.


20 posted on 01/22/2009 7:15:21 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-200 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson