I thought THEY said ID had no connexion to Creation Science?
Creation science CAN utilize the SCIENCE of ID, as the SCIENCE does NOT conflict with biblical principles concerning actual scientific evidence- However, ID does NOT need a connection to Creation science to stand on it’s own merrits- the SCIENCE of ID stands on it’s own merrits as ID makes NO inference as to who or what the intelligence might be, nor is that hteir goal- their only concern is the forensic SCIENCE, and presentign enough SCIENTIFIC evidence that strongly indicates that an intelligence is needed
While SOME people within ID have OPINIONS BEYOND the science, their opinions do NOT constitute the ACTUAL SCIENCE of ID, and htose tryign to intimate that their OPINIONS do are doign so dishonestly and hsoudl be shamed of htemselves.
There are whole groups of scientists who may have OPINIONS OUTSIDE of the science of Macroeovltuio, but do their OPINIONS OUTSIDE of hte ACTUAL SCIENCE automatically invalidate their science? Of course not! It’s an intellectually DISHONEST tactic to suggest that OPINIONS of scientists invalidate hteir science.
==I thought THEY said ID had no connexion to Creation Science?
Creation Science and ID overlap because they both deal with detecting intelligent design. The difference is that Creation Scientists investigate the historical claims of the Bible, whereas ID scientists are searching for evidence of intelligent design without the aid of divine revelation. Thus, most of ID can be fit into Creation Science, but most of Creation Science cannot be fit into ID.