Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Orwell's Children
American Thinker ^ | November 16, 2008 | Bruce Walker

Posted on 11/15/2008 11:31:11 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: MathDoc
Obama will not just be a stranger who looks out for us, he will be our Big Brother, and he will be watching.

 
 
 

 
 

Eerily familiar...

Party ownership of the print media
made it easy to manipulate public opinion,
and the film and radio carried the process further.

 
 


16. Ministry Of Truth

.......

The Ministry of Truth, Winston's place of work, contained, it was said, three thousand rooms above ground level, and corresponding ramifications below.

The Ministsry of Truth concerned itself with Lies. Party ownership of the print media made it easy to manipulate public opinion, and the film and radio carried the process further.

The primary job of the Ministry of Truth was to supply the citizens of Oceania with newspapers, films, textbooks, telescreen programmes, plays, novels - with every conceivable kind of information, instruction, or entertainment, from a statue to a slogan, from a lyric poem to a biological treatise, and from a child's spelling-book to a Newspeak dictionary.

Winston worked in the RECORDS DEPARTMENT (a single branch of the Ministry of Truth) editing and writing for The Times. He dictated into a machine called a speakwrite. Winston would receive articles or news-items which for one reason or another it was thought necessary to alter, or, in Newspeak, rectify. If, for example, the Ministry of Plenty forecast a surplus, and in reality the result was grossly less, Winston's job was to change previous versions so the old version would agree with the new one. This process of continuous alteration was applied not only to newspapers, but to books, periodicals, pamphlets, posters, leaflets, films, sound-tracks, cartoons, photographs - to every kind of literature or documentation which might conceivably hold any political or ideological significance.

When his day's work started, Winston pulled the speakwrite towards him, blew the dust from its mouthpiece, and put on his spectacles. He dialed 'back numbers' on the telescreen and called for the appropriate issues of The Times, which slid out of the pneumatic tube after only a few minutes' delay. The messages he had received referred to articles or news-items which for one reason or another it was thought necessary to rectify.

In the walls of the cubicle there were three orifices. To the right of the speakwrite, a small pneumatic tube for written messages; to the left, a larger one for newspapers; and on the side wall, within easy reach of Winston's arm, a large oblong slit protected by a wire grating. This last was for the disposal of waste paper. Similar slits existed in thousands or tens of thousands throughout the building, not only in every room but at short intervals in every corridor. For some reason they were nicknamed memory holes. When one knew that any document was due for destruction, or even when one saw a scrap of waste paper lying about, it was an automatic action to lift the flap of the nearest memory hole and drop it in, whereupon it would be whirled away on a current of warm air to the enormous furnaces which were hidden somewhere in the recesses of the building.

As soon as Winston had dealt with each of the messages, he clipped his speakwritten corrections to the appropriate copy of The Times and pushed them into the pneumatic tube. Then, with a movement which was as nearly as possible unconsicious, he crumpled up the original message and any notes that he himself had made, and dropped them into the memory hole to be devoured by the flames.

What happened in the unseen labyrinth to which the tubes led, he did not know in detail, but he did know in general terms. As soon as all the corrections which happened to be necessary in any particular number of The Times had been assembled and collated, that number would be reprinted, the original copy destroyed, and the corrected copy placed on the files in its stead.

In the cubicle next to him the little woman with sandy hair toiled day in day out, simply at tracking down and deleting from the Press the names of people who had been vaporized and were therefore considered never to have existed. And this hall, with its fifty workers or thereabouts, was only one-sub-section, a single cell, as it were, in the huge complexity of the Records Department. Beyond, above, below, were other swarms of workers engaged in an unimaginable multitude of jobs.

There were huge printing-shops and their sub editors, their typography experts, and their elaborately equipped studios for the faking of photographs. There was the tele-programmes section with its engineers, its producers and its teams of actors specially chosen for their skill in imitating voices; clerks whose job was simply to draw up lists of books and periodicals which were due for recall; vast repositories where the corrected documents were stored; and the hidden furnaces where the original copies were destroyed.

And somewhere or other, quite anonymous, there were the directing brains who co-ordinated the whole effort and laid down the lines of policy which made it necessary that this fragment of the past should be preserved, that one falsified, and the other rubbed out of existence.


 
 
(ref #18) Similar Weasels tend to be swallowed up all the time on FR.

21 posted on 11/16/2008 4:48:44 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
The same goes for David Koresh and similar weasels...
22 posted on 11/16/2008 4:49:19 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana; colorcountry; Utah Binger; greyfoxx39; P-Marlowe; SkyPilot; trisham
And somewhere or other, quite anonymous, there were the directing brains who co-ordinated the whole effort and laid down the lines of policy which made it necessary that this fragment of the past should be preserved, that one falsified, and the other rubbed out of existence.
 
 
HMMmm...
 
 
 

23 posted on 11/16/2008 4:55:37 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This post needs to be read by every FreeRepublic member.

Ping!

JoMa


24 posted on 11/16/2008 5:01:14 AM PST by joma89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

Not too long before the Jones Town thing occurred, Jim Jones was travelling through the south, putting ads in local papers advertising “evangelistic church meetings” where he would give a little talk, like Obama, saying nothing, pass the collection plate and sell tapes. My MIL, who was into the whole charismatic thing back then, and I went to one of his meetings in Franklin, TN at one of the mainline churches there. My main impression of him was one of a paranoid person. I just remember him going on about his having been involved in a wreck where the devil had tried to kill him. He didn’t talk communism, nor religion either. Just a lot of mumbo jumbo the best I can remember. I think he was just doing the “evangelistic meetings” to finance their expenses. In retrospect, his meetings must have been routinely scheduled during the week when women would come to them. Ha. Evidently my MIL and I didn’t fit the leftist profile.


25 posted on 11/16/2008 5:03:43 AM PST by Twinkie (REPENT! Look Up! The Lord's Return Is At Hand . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Michael Power in early 1939 wrote: "In the Christianity of the German people, the National Socialist has found the one enemy it could not vanquish" - and Christians in Germany, alone, chose to voluntarily seek death before selling their souls to Nazism.

Certainly some notable Christians in Germany, but not all...


On April 20, 1939, Archbishop Orsenigo celebrated Hitler's
birthday. The celebrations, initiated by Pacelli (Pope Pius XII)
became a tradition. Each April 20, Cardinal Bertram of Berlin
was to send "warmest congratulations to the Fuhrer in the name of
the bishops and the dioceses in Germany" and added with
"fervent prayers which the Catholics of Germany are
sending to heaven on their altars."

"[Adolf Hitler is] the tool of God, called upon to overcome Judaism..." - Father Wilhelm Senn, a Catholic priest, writing in a Catholic publication, May 15, 1934

And in 1941, Hitler himself proclaimed to General Gerhard Engel: "I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so."

The main thing that the Christian community in Germany rose up against in earnest in the Nazi program was the forced sterilization and euthanasia of the "unfit," and they were able to beat it back.

26 posted on 11/16/2008 5:13:23 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

Bump for later


27 posted on 11/16/2008 5:50:15 AM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Orderville
28 posted on 11/16/2008 6:38:44 AM PST by Utah Binger (Southern Utah, where the world comes to see America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Yes, I know that Wikipedia can be managed and edited by anybody. That's part of the plan here. If it's black and white it must be right. How do I know that? Some of my best work can be found here.
29 posted on 11/16/2008 6:52:26 AM PST by Utah Binger (Southern Utah, where the world comes to see America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ElayneJ
And when you look up one of the handful of uses and definitions of the word "religion", it does fit.

I have a religion aside from my Catholism: minarchism.

30 posted on 11/16/2008 7:01:13 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (Do class-warfare and disdain of laissez-faire have their places in today's GOP?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

Placemark


31 posted on 11/16/2008 7:51:33 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (Tagline on vacation during the grand experiment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

1984’s “IngSoc” was itself a Doublethink misnomer, just like “Ministry of Love” (which was about torture). In fact, IngSoc was intended to be an amalgam of English and American societies at the time.

The characteristics of Oceania are:

1. Anyone who doesn’t agree with the Party, EVEN WHEN THEY ARE CORRECT, is an enemy of the state. Hence, even top officials in the regime can be denounced as traitors. There is no middle ground, no room for compromise.

2. The War: One minute the enemy is Eurasia, then it’s Eastasia. The name of the enemy can even switch mid-sentence. The reason for this is that the three superpowers are fighting each other at all - the whole thing is a propaganda invention to unite the people within each superpower, boost support for the military, and the stories of great victories in far-off countries are used to boost morale and economic activity.

3. The revisionist culture of DoubleThink is used to convince people that whatever the regime says, is based on recordable fact even when it’s not.

4. The vitriol directed against Goldstein the man, flies in the face of the fact he’s the only political figurehead who’s actually talking sense. But he’s talking about stopping the war, rebuilding the country, and cutting the crap, which obviously the regime itself doesn’t want to hear.

5. The Anti-Sex Brigade is a sop to personal morality instigated by the regime to get people to focus on its wants not theirs; however it is a quasi-religious movement as it placates the most spiritually-minded proles.

6. The surveillance society. One thing that suppresses dissent is the feeling that “Big Brother is watching you”.

Any of these dubious qualities can be attached to ANY government, socialist or fascist, republican or democrat, religious or secular.

The book is an indictment of any political elite that gets so drunk on power that it begins to serve itself instead of the people, becomes intolerant of criticism or rejection from the people, and relies on fear and paranoia to keep the people on its side.


32 posted on 11/16/2008 7:59:11 AM PST by Don Stadt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...



Libertarian ping! Click here to get added or here to be removed or post a message here!
33 posted on 11/16/2008 7:59:16 AM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead

You do a fine service. Thanks as always for the pings.


34 posted on 11/16/2008 8:02:35 AM PST by maclay (We've been Baracked)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: maclay

My pleasure!


35 posted on 11/16/2008 8:14:29 AM PST by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Don Stadt; Avoiding_Sulla
"The book is an indictment of any political elite that gets so drunk on power that it begins to serve itself instead of the people, becomes intolerant of criticism or rejection from the people, and relies on fear and paranoia to keep the people on its side."

That is, ALL political elites.

Cincinnatus is long dead. We await our Sulla.

36 posted on 11/16/2008 8:24:46 AM PST by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

May God confound the godless Marxist!


37 posted on 11/16/2008 8:55:04 AM PST by Alkhin (“I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell.” ~ Harry S Truman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; xzins
From the COMMUNIST MANIFESTO:

Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.

And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, etc.? The Communists have not intended the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.

The bourgeois claptrap about the family and education, about the hallowed correlation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labor.

But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams the bourgeoisie in chorus.

The bourgeois sees his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women.

He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.

For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce free love; it has existed almost from time immemorial.

Our bourgeois, not content with having wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other's wives. (Ah, those were the days!)

Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalized system of free love. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of free love springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private.

.

Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Manifesto of the Communist Party 1848

Now tell me that today's liberals are not Communists.

38 posted on 11/16/2008 9:16:11 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I’ve been saying the same for years. Not so succinctly or expertly but the same. It bugs me that he has to call them Orwell’s children. Although it works to get the point across. They are Orwell’s murderers more like as they are erasing all knowledge of him or what he warned us of.

Just an aside: It is necessary to read C.S. Lewis’s “The Abolition of Man” to get just WHY man behaves in this manner. It IS puzzeling. Lewis does an excellent job of explaining it. Also the mechanics of just how it will come to pass and the inevitable conclusion of human kind on ‘this’ earth.


39 posted on 11/16/2008 9:29:01 AM PST by gost2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Jones: Christian or Communist?
40 posted on 11/16/2008 9:58:16 AM PST by JACKRUSSELL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson