I also saw her on Gibson and Couric.
And I can hear her speak - almost as bad as Obama without a script. I just didn't like the depth of thought. I didn't like her answer to what constitutes a 'elitism.'
Anyway, it's over. Maybe another four years of seasoning can change this - someone get her a subscription to Foreign Affairs.
Of course, I would vote for her in a heartbeat over any Democrat.
It doesn't matter. You and I and everyone here will be in sharp agreement on her competency if and when she decides to run in 2004 and has a few press conferences, townhall meetings, etc.
You know, as much as I like and admire Palin—I don’t really know her, only from what I’ve seen here on the net and from what I’ve read. Tv has been disconnected for 20 mos now & will stay that way—but I was stunned that she could not answer simple questions about what newspapers, mags, etc she read, even if she just ignores print media she would at least know the names of AK papers, then there are Field&Stream, Am Rifleman, Time & newsweek—it is possible Kourik’s pals did some censoring to make Palin look really dumb, but then after seeing the results, she would have jumped on them with all 4 feet, no? She has a terrific personality and boundless energy but it’s really hard to see much ‘depth’ amongst all the fever of a pol. campaign.