Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eagle Eye; All
Or maybe it means McCain/Palin was such a strong candidate Obama could only win with the deck stacked in his favor including "8 times the money."

McCain is not to blame here. Thanks to W's inept and incompetent leadership he had a very tough hill to climb. He was doing fine until the mini-meltdown of the economy.

Palin was not without her faults as a candidate either.

378 posted on 11/06/2008 3:26:30 PM PST by newzjunkey (God damn America? He has indeed, Rev Wright. He has indeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey
Or maybe it means McCain/Palin was such a strong candidate Obama could only win with the deck stacked in his favor including "8 times the money."

You have got to be kidding, right?

NOWHERE was McCain ever considered a strong candidate and he would have sunken if not for Palin. Look at vote totals and tell me he was strong.

McCain is not to blame here.

Absolutely is. He ran a poor campaign and wasnt even the favorite Republican candidiate, just the one left standing. He was the problem and his organization was to blame. That means him.

400 posted on 11/06/2008 4:11:48 PM PST by Eagle Eye (Obama's Marxism--Chains you can believe in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson