The “evidence” so far is a legitimate Hawaii birth certificate that some people will do anything to believe is a fake, and an unsubstantiated claim that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born there.
It is NOT “unsubstantiated”. The claim is from three sources citing some 100 artifacts at variance with official Hawaiian documents. Instead, CB, the problem is that either an official document was tampered with to an astonishing degree, or an astonishing forgery was created.
Then those 100 artifacts must be displayed.
The low-res PDF that those three sources analayzed is old news. Please look at post 26 on this thread for a high-res picture of the actual birh certificate.
Could it be a forgery? I suppose anything is possible. But extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof which, frankly, I'm just not seeing.