Obama's "Radicalism" a Growing Chasm on Road to Victory

I realized something after Tuesday night's debate: If (big if) Barack Obama is not elected president next month, it will not be John McCain who defeats him.

McCain may be Obama's official opponent, but he isn't making the core case against him: namely, the case against Obama's deep roots in radicalism, which the Democratic nominee has never pulled up and grown away from. This is why if Obama loses on Election Day, it won't be McCain who defeats him. Like a flashy third-party candidate who ends up drawing just enough support from one candidate to put the other over the top, it is Obama's connections to anti-American extremism -- his incubation in a radical comfort zone home to ex-Weather Underground leader William Ayers, ex-PLO mouthpiece Rashid Khalidi, anti-white-and-anti-"middleclassness" minister Jeremiah Wright and others -- that will doom his presidential ambitions.

McCain, Obama and, coming up on the outside, Obama's radicalism: This three-way race has created a weird dynamic as the candidates turn into the final stretch. Blinkers on, McCain hobbles after Obama, who is now desperately trying to shake off the radicalism that could trip him up before the finish line. Again, no thanks to McCain, whose winks at Obama's radicalism, Sarah Palin's stumpside references notwithstanding, are not what has brought it to the fore. The fact is, Obama's ties to radicalism are taking on a life of their own.

Such a "life" is in no way documented in the mainstream media (MSM). Just consider our leading journalists' idea of professional responsibility when it comes to, for example, Obama's connection to unrepentant Pentagon bomber William Ayers.

Ayers -- a violent, 1960s militant who later decided that radicalizing education in the guise of "reform" was the front-line of revolution -- is infamous for a New York Times interview published on Sept. 11, 2001 in which he not only declared America "makes me want to puke," but also discussed his group's violent attacks on American military and civilian targets, asserting, "we didn't do enough." His working relationship with Obama, as documented by Stanley Kurtz, goes back to the 1990s when Obama served as chairman of a $150 million charity, which Kurtz describes as Ayers' "brainchild," that doled out money to far-left groups such as ACORN. Funny, as Kurtz has noted, Obama never mentioned these five years of what is his only executive experience in either of his two memoirs. Not so funny is Obama's dishonest description of Ayers as "just a guy who lives in my neighborhood."

MSM coverage of the relationship has been hardly more forthcoming. It runs from demonstrable whitewash -- as put over in the New York Times, which, in nixing notable ties, omitted all mention of copious, previously published evidence to the contrary -- to overt damage control, as conducted by the Associated Press. The AP actually argued that Palin's reference to the Obama-Ayers relationship as Obama "(palling) around with terrorists" conveyed a "racially tinged subtext." Huh? According to the AP, Palin's remarks were racist because "terrorists are envisioned as dark-skinned radical Muslims." Therefore....

Are they kidding? In a word, no. But such efforts may signal a desperate response to growing, inchoate unease in the land, a silent, or sighing, or very privately discussed queasiness over the prospect of making an American president out of a man who not only didn't cross the street to shun a punk like Ayers, but was so comfortable with Ayers -- who, not incidentally, in 1995 described himself as "a radical, Leftist, small 'c' communist" -- that Obama launched his political career from Ayers' living room, also in 1995.

This relationship continued, as even the New York Times perhaps inadvertently reported: Obama "said they have not spoken by phone or exchanged e-mail messages since Mr. Obama began serving in the United States Senate in January 2005." Ask yourself: What American president -- any party, any era -- would have maintained correspondence with Mr. America "makes me want to puke" for that long? And about the year 2005: Isn't that roughly when Obama decided to run for president?

Americans may be fuzzy on the details -- and how could they be clear, given the media's pro-Obama activities -- but some are realizing, slowly and with no corroboration in the public square, that such radical ties don't pass presidential muster.

Or do they? In the end, the answer will decide the election. Meanwhile, we, the people, are on our own. Once, America's political and media and social institutions would have reflexively rejected a presidential candidate with an alliance with, or even an affinity for, an unrepentant terrorist and anti-establishment revolutionary. No more. The line between the establishment and the anti-establishment has vanished -- at least as far as our political and media and social institutions are concerned. But there remain citizens for whom such distinctions matter.

Writing at National Review Online, Andrew C. McCarthy pegged the significance of the Obama-Ayers connection: "Yes, Ayers is blunter than Obama. As he so delicately told the Times, America makes him `want to puke.' The smoother Obama is content to say our society needs fundamental `change.' But what they're talking about," he wrote, referring to their complementary visions, "is not materially different. Such sentiments should make Obama unelectable."

Actually, such sentiments should make Obama radioactive. But ours is a culture of relativism in which one "belief system" is considered as valid as any other. Democracy? Marxism? Whatever! Lawful elections? Bombing the Pentagon? What's the difference? So greatly transformed by relativism is our society that not even elder statesman and veteran John McCain is alarmed by Obama's radicalism. If he were, this patriot who puts "country first," would be doing everything in his power to warn the American people against it.

Not that it matters, not now, not since Obama's radicalism entered the race. If this stalking horse finishes strong, Obama loses and America wins -- despite the other candidate.

No, it won’t be John McCain who defeats Barack Hussein Obama, that’s for d*mn sure.
If anybody is to take him down, it’s going to have to be us.

McCain is losing this campaign because he refuses to fight Obama and his lies, and dirty tactics such as ACORN voter fraud. He’s just been rolling over (or bending over, I should say) and accepting the abuse heaped upon him- and expecially Sarah Palin.

He should have been hitting Obama back hard months ago.
He needs to get out there every day and FIGHT BACK- name names.

Email Republican headquarters/McCain.
FReep ‘EM OUT!
REMIND McCAIN THAT HE HAS AN OBLIGATION AS OUR CANDIDATE TO FIGHT BACK!
To h*ll with bipartisian BS!
To h*ll with PC!
To h*ll with ‘conducting a respectful campaign’as McCain has said, and vowed to do.
RESPECTFUL CAMPAIGNING WENT STRAIGHT OUT THE WINDOW WITH OBAMA’S NASTY, BRUTAL COMMENTS SUCH AS;
‘lipstick on a pig’ and ‘You can wrap AN OLD FISH in a piece of paper called change. It’s still going to stink after eight years.’

Take off the gloves, McCain!
Hit the Marxist/Muslim hard with Ayers, Acorn, Violation of Logan Act, abortion, 2nd admendment, Campaigning for Odinga!!

Get off the d*mned economy issue. State that Obama/Democrats/ACORN caused this meltdown. State McCain offered a proposal to avert the meltdown, state your solution- and GET OFF IT.
Obama is counting on keeping this going to take the spotlight off his sordid past and dirty dealings!
NOTHING is more important than waking America up to this Marxist/Muslim!! DO IT. EXPOSE HIM!
FReep ‘EM!!!!

MCCAIN/REPUBLICAN PARTY
Fax: 202-228-2862
Send a fax FREE: https://faxzero.com/

rickdavis@johnmccain.com, ameese@mccain08hq.com, anickel@mccain08hq.com,
johnmccain@gop.com, info@gop.com,
RNCommunications@gop.com, Chairman@gop.com, Political@gop.com
info@McCainPalinVictory2008.com

Meghan McCain http://mccainblogette.com/contact/

THE CONSERVATIVE ACTIVIST’S
(all the Republican movers and shakers)
GIANT E-MAIL LINKS PAGE!
http://www.conservativeusa.org/megalink.htm
.
IMPORTANT
Be sure to add your name and town and email - or they won’t read them.
When emailing. they won’t read mass emails so put just one email add in the “to” line then click on BBC at the end of that line. a BCC line will open just above subject line. copy paste the rest of the addresses in there and each recipient will see ONLY their name.

FReep THE MSM!
SEND THEM DAMAGING INFO ON OBAMA. DEMAND THEY DO THEIR JOB AND INVESTIGATE.

CAN THEY IGNORE A MILLION EMAILS??

Glen Beck of CNN gets it. He’s exposing Obama.
Anderson Cooper of CNN gets it. He did a story of Obama’s deep involvement with Ayers.
CNN is one of THE most leftist of the MSM.

ElRushbo@eibnet.com
me@glennbeck.com
stu@glennbeck.com,

Hannity@foxnews.com
http://www.lauraingraham.com/asklaura
On the Record w/ Greta Van Susteren — Ontherecord@foxnews.com
letters@charleskrauthammer.com

FOX & Friends — Friends@foxnews.com
FOX News Live — Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Live w/ Jamie Colby — Jamie@foxnews.com
FOX News Live Weekend — Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Specials — Viewerservices@foxnews.com
FOX News Sunday — FNS@foxnews.com
FOX News Watch — Newswatch@foxnews.com
FOX Report w/ Shepard Smith — Foxreport@foxnews.com

Obama connection with ACORN http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDZiMjkwMDczZWI5ODdjOWYxZTIzZGIyNzEyMjE0ODI=

Obama goes to Kenya on the tax payer’s dollar to campaign for the murderous Islam-backed Odinga!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=S8QcpdUtxNQ&feature=related
SHORT VERSION:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1P_P8lBCsE

Obama talks about Ayers giving him a job:
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=D-45A6I

Fox News
The Beltway Boys — Beltway@foxnews.com
The Big Story w/ John Gibson — Myword@foxnews.com
The Big Story Weekend — Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
The Big Story Primetime — Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
Bulls & Bears — Bullsandbears@foxnews.com
Cashin’ In — Cash@foxnews.com
Cavuto on Business — Cavuto@foxnews.com
DaySide — Dayside@foxnews.com
Forbes on FOX — Forbes@foxnews.com
FOX & Friends — Friends@foxnews.com
FOX News Live — Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Live w/ Jamie Colby — Jamie@foxnews.com
FOX News Live Weekend — Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Specials — Viewerservices@foxnews.com
FOX News Sunday — FNS@foxnews.com
FOX News Watch — Newswatch@foxnews.com
FOX Report w/ Shepard Smith — Foxreport@foxnews.com
Hannity & Colmes — Hannity@foxnews.com or Colmes@foxnews.com
Heartland w/ John Kasich — Heartland@foxnews.com
The Journal Editorial Report — JER@foxnews.com
The Lineup — Lineup@foxnews.com
The O’Reilly Factor — Oreilly@foxnews.com
Special Report w/ Brit Hume — Special@foxnews.com
Studio B w/ Shepard Smith — Studiob@foxnews.com
War Stories w/ Oliver North — Warstories@foxnews.com
Your World w/ Neil Cavuto — Cavuto@foxnews.com

phil.griffin@nbc.com, steve.capus@nbc.com, Steve.Capus@nbcuni.com, gary.sheffer@ge.com, renata.hopkins@ge.com, lisa.lanspery@ge.com, brian.williams@msnbc.com, chris.matthews@msnbc.com, countdown@msnbc.com, hardball@msnbc.com, Today@NBC.com, viewerservices@msnbc.com, nightly@nbc.com, World@MSNBC.com, Dateline@NBC.com, world@msnbc.com, atc@npr.org, morning@npr.org, Letters@msnbc.com, totn@npr.org, newshour@pbs.org, joe@msnbc.com, abrams@msnbc.com, byork@nationalreview.com, comments@mclaughlin.com, ElRushbo@eibnet.com, evening@cbsnews.com, Foxreport@foxnews.com,. gretawire@fox.com, Hannity@foxnews.com, hemmer@foxnews.com, hume@foxnews.com, ElRushbo@eibnet.com, me@glennbeck.com,oreilly@foxnews.com,Joe@msnbc.com, letters@charleskrauthammer.com, lindamuller@buchanan.org,me@glennbeck.com,netaudr@abc.com, Ontherecord@foxnews.com, oreilly@foxnews.com, race08@msnbc.com, Special@foxnews.com, stu@glennbeck.com, ureport@foxnews.com, weekendlive@foxnews.com, LouDobbs@cnn.com, jake.tapper@abc.com, 360@cnn.com, a.latour@wsj.com, a.murray@wsj.com, am@cnn.com, amhotshots@cnn.com, caffertyfile@cnn.com, campbellbrown@cnn.com, cnn.feedback@cnn.com, cnn.onair@cnn.com, cnn@cnn.com, crossfire@cnn.com, darren.mcdermott@wsj.com, daybreak@cnn.com, elrushbo@eibnet.com, foxreport@foxnews.com, hannity@foxnews.com, headlinenews@cnn.com, insidepoliticts@cnn.com, inthemoney@cnn.com, j.fry@wsj.com, jeff.greenfield@cnn.com, je@msnbc.com, dlow@cnbc.com, late.edition@cnn.com, letters@msnbc.com, live@cnn.com, livefrom@cnn.com, livetoday@cnn.com, lookingout@cnn.com, loudobbs@cnn.com, moneyline@cnn.com, newsnight@cnn.com, newstips@cnn.com, paulazahn@cnn.com, podcast@cnn.com, primenews@cnn.com, question@cnn.com, special@foxnews.com, t.cullen@wsj.com, tina.cowles@cnn.com, tom.hannon@cnn.com, wam@cnn.com, wolf@cnn.com, wsj.ltrs@wsj.com

IMPORTANT
Be sure to add your name and town and email - or they won’t read them.
When emailing. they won’t read mass emails so put just one email add in the “to” line then click on BBC at the end of that line. a BCC line will open just above subject line. copy paste the rest of the addresses in there and each recipient will see ONLY their name

Somebody wake me from this nightmare.

After going back and forth a few times, I am, alas, convinced this nightmare is going to be at least four years long.

I'm not in the mood for back-and-forthing on this. I understand mine is a minority opinion here. I get it. The election hasn't happened yet. I get it. The polls can't predict... I get it, okay?

But people around here seem to forget--because we have already pushed him aside as not part of this election--that George W. Bush is not loved in this country. He is so disliked that the party he is a part of is going to feel the wrath of voters. Obama keeps talking about "8 years of failed policies" because IT WORKS. It reopens that wound, and when we look for the source of that pain continuing, we see the guy with the R after his name.

The Americans who will vote for Obama don't care about the intricacies of porkbarrel this or Ayers that, or "My friends" or any number of things. And they don't think Sarah Palin is a genius and so incredibly awesome that they simply MUST vote for her. She isn't as popular as we seem to think she is.

Americans want CHANGE. They think the world is horrible, and they want to change things as much as they possibly can. They have been fed a steady diet of "The Rich" and "The Greedy" FROM BOTH CAMPAIGNS as well as the news media. The Republican party is still considered The Party of the Rich.

You can tell these people the mountain of facts behind this stunningly empty suit and THEY DO NOT CARE. They are like children holding their hands over their ears and humming and saying "I can't heeeeear yooooou!" Because they would have to listen to a lot of information, read boring articles. And all these voters want is to work their jobs, come home, and turn on the tube, and see their 401k is doing nicely.

Iraq isn't an issue that will decide this election. McCain can keep saying "He was wrong about Iraq!"--no one gives a damn because we were ALL wrong on Iraq--the WMDs weren't there (I know that's not the only reason we went there, but we let the news media MAKE that the only reason). So when Obama says "Iraq didn't cause 9-11," boom, that's the quick answer a frustrated, scared voter who wants the government to Make Things Better needs so he can repeat it when one of us gets into the complexities of life.

Obama's emptiness makes him the perfect candidate for our times because he's basically saying to the voter, "Imagine what you will--I have a pleasant smile, I'm not scary like that guy over there, I'm cool like the cliche of the suave black guy in a suit--look at him, cranky like your grandfather."

We seem to have forgotten that not all Americans are like us, and many Americans vote on what they WANT reality to be. They WANT Obama to be An Agent of Change because then they can feel SOMEthing will change (because things WILL change with him, good God they will). They WANT Obama to just be cool, because then they can claim to have done something GOOD themselves--I voted for a black guy, I've done something that will bring racial equality to our troubled nation!

I just don't see us waking from this nightmare early in November. I go to Realclear and I look at those polls, and I look at the news media reports, and I look at McCain's awful debate performances...and I just don't see a win.

I wish I did.

The only way Barack Obama will be elected President is for us to fail to tell enough voters.

The Post American World of Barack Obama

The Post American World, by Fareed Zakaria

...connecting the dots to show Barack Obama's long-standing,
continuously developing, anti-American alliances...

Barack Obama & the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis

Listen to this Interview of James Simpson, by Sandy Rios, Tuesday 9/30 - WYLL 1160AM, Chicago, IL
From http://www.culturecampaign.com/culturecorner.aspx

Simpson documents his research in his article, providing Web links. He provides a rough flow chart.

"CHANGE"

Further corroboration on Obama & The Cloward-Piven Strategy:

Obama, Voter Fraud & Mortgage Meltdown, by James H. Walsh, former federal prosecutor.

On Barack Obama's Marxist connections in Chicago

Web Archives Confirm Barack Obama Was Member Of [Marxist] Socialist 'New Party' In 1996

On Alice Palmer, the South Side's Marxist State Senator, Who Hand Picked Barack Obama to Succeed Her

More on Obama's Marxist alliance with Radical Islamists:

Barack Obama campaigning with taxpayers' money for Raila Odinga, Marxist & pro-Islamist, despotic leader in Kenya

Barack Obama & Khalid Al-Mansour (old Black Panther comrade of Ayers & Dohrn and likely of Alice Palmer) who raised funds to get Obama into Harvard

And then there are... Herbert and Marion Sandler, the Pritzkers, and the "loose lips" of Charles Schumer and Harry Reid (and Henry Paulson is not above suspicion, with his control-freak power play and Goldman Sachs cronyism).

Get these breakthrough items out to everyone you know (or anything even more informative that comes up) -- voters, media, officials and staff of both parties, everyone. We have time if we act now.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.