Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/05/2008 9:04:23 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TigerLikesRooster; Uncle Ike; RSmithOpt; jiggyboy; 2banana; Travis McGee; OwenKellogg; 31R1O; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 10/05/2008 9:04:56 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

love it!


3 posted on 10/05/2008 9:06:09 PM PDT by ken21 (people die and you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PAR35; bamahead; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; happygrl; Roy Tucker; GOPJ; ..

The Money, Banking, and Financial Markets Ping List.

FR Keyword: moneylist

This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

To join, send Freepmail to rabscuttle385.

4 posted on 10/05/2008 9:08:34 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 ("Please sir, may I have another!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

There’s only one reason why Citigroup would be fighting to get Wachovia, and that is because they see the “value” of Wachovia as something that is beneficial to them.

Well, so does Wells Fargo, and they are willing to *pay* with their *own money* a drastically higher price than Citigroup is going to pay — and *without* any “guarantees” by the Fed.

Citigroup simply wants to make a killing at the expense of the American taxpayer and use the Fed to “guarantee” its “killling”.

There is a lot more value to Wachovia than a “fire sale” would indicate — and indeed a fire sale that was *forced* on Wachovia, by the Fed, in the first place.

They had better let the Wells Fargo deal go through since it’s totally with their own money and own funds and at a *lot higher price* than what Citigroup wants to do. (In fact, once could say that Citigroup wants to *steal it* — using the Fed for “cover”).


5 posted on 10/05/2008 9:19:00 PM PDT by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Grewat the deal will go through without costing the taxpayer a large fortune!


8 posted on 10/05/2008 9:43:27 PM PDT by B4Ranch (I'd rather have a VP that can gut a Moose, than a President that wants to gut our Second Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Wells all the way to Fargo if you ask me.


13 posted on 10/05/2008 11:22:56 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Damned if I see a compelling reason to forbid the private sector to arrange this deal, rather than the taxpayer being involved.

What could that first NY judge have been thinking?

silly me.


14 posted on 10/05/2008 11:49:00 PM PDT by Carley (she's all out of caribou.............but does have a bracelet!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

thanks Tiger for all the pings....interesting scenario coming to a head. Looking at crude futures now.


17 posted on 10/06/2008 3:12:31 AM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Like a couple of jackals fighting over the carcass. Things are getting really ugly.


19 posted on 10/06/2008 6:47:44 PM PDT by catfish1957 (Hey algore...You'll have to pry the steering wheel of my 317 HP V8 truck from my cold dead hands)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson