Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain: Reverse your position on Ethanol - Iowa wants to vote for you.

Posted on 09/30/2008 12:57:05 PM PDT by o2bfree

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: Glenn

Don’t take me for a fool.



Stop the flames folks. I work for Oracle as a consultant working on Financial Services applications for the big banks in North America. I was only relaying a story from a guy I know at work who's family and friends live in Iowa.

And no, I wasn't for the wall street bailout. With what I know about the banking industry (I go to NY a lot) I have known it was a scam from the start
61 posted on 09/30/2008 1:30:39 PM PDT by o2bfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree
Some, basically you're saying that Iowans are trying to shake down the rest of the country? "Give us our ethanol subsidies, or we vote to put a Marxist, empty-suit police-stater into power?

Bah, Idiots Out Walking Around.

62 posted on 09/30/2008 1:37:00 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Here they come boys! As thick as grass, and as black as thunder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree
Sorry, using any food source to produce fuel is just stupid....this from a family who still has a family farm raising corn.
63 posted on 09/30/2008 1:37:53 PM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

The ethanol scammeroo has increased corn prices, so the Iowans think they love it. The only .....OL that makes sense as a motor fuel as an energy source is METHANol, which can be made from low-grade coal, wood chips, that’s too dirty to burn in powerplants.


64 posted on 09/30/2008 1:38:56 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (Drill. Double Refining Capacity. Make METHANOL from Coal, NG, Nuclear ..let's roll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
Ethanol is a total scam. Country first.

Amen.

They should use sugar for making fuel, not corn.

And the Gov't should not be subsidizing it.

65 posted on 09/30/2008 1:59:52 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration ('we don't make compromises-we make Marines')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

there have been a number of studies - at best it yields a tiny bit more energy than oil inputs, but others report parity or a net loss. Without subsidies the whole thing would dry up and blow away fast.


66 posted on 09/30/2008 2:10:27 PM PDT by Tirian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree
When I was working in state government years ago, I had the choice of voting for Republicans who promised to cut taxes or Democrats who would probably do a better job of keeping my job safe at the taxpayer's expense. I voted Republican, they cut taxes, I got laid off. Why? Because I put doing the right thing above my own financial interests. It's time your Iowa friends put their country first.
67 posted on 09/30/2008 3:12:54 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

Hydrogen(28%), methanol(50%), and ethanol(67%) as transportation fuels are all a complete waste of resources - and BILLIONS of dollars. For transportation fuel, volume energy density - not weight - is the key measurement.

Volume energy densities of these substitutes range from piddling to paltry compared to hydrocarbon fuels (gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel) and none of them is a reasonable alternative to the hydrocarbon fuel it purports to replace. All of them have been force-fit into some niche “demonstration” pproject, but the massive subsidies, forced accommodations (flex-fuel design, and lower MPG) and collateral damage (how does your lawnmower engine, tank, and fuel lines like “gasahol”?) present clear evidence of unsuitability.

Government meddling forced us to use MTBE “to save the environment” - UNTIL the Government banned MTBE due to its “environmental damage!” So the Government switched to mandatory ethanol - and then they “doubled down” by DOUBLING the percentage of ethanol that we would be REQUIRED to use in our vehicles. The result has been a WORLD WIDE disruption of food production, with results appearing here as dramatic price increases, but in other parts of the world as shortages, famine, starvation, and death.

Ethanol is as wrong as hydrogen, but between Government “investment” of tax dollars and forcing the car companies to modify their cars to tolerate adulterated and exotic fuels, we have wasted far more on ethanol.

Decades - and probably, centuries - from now, I believe that our transportation “fuel of the future” will be almost identical to the transportation fuels of today. However, the source will change. Today’s crude petroleum comes from KEROGENS - ancient organic matter - primarily algae - buried deep in the Earth, modified by subterranean heat and pressure into crude oil that we find, extract, refine, distribute, and use.

Tomorrow, I believe that we will shorten that process by growing “optimized” algae in bioreactors using CO2, sunlight, and sea or sewage water; extracting the “green crude oil” from the algae; and sending it to the same refineries that we use today. Productivity should exceed land-based agriculture by at least an order of magnitude, with the limiting factor being available sunlight.

Unfortunately, the Government still has its collective head in the same dark, smelly, stupid place, and is focused almost ENTIRELY on ethanol for the future. Their official Biomass Program Multi-Year Program Plan:
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/biomass_program_mypp.pdf
shows this blindness in excruciating detail. They do mention other projects, but there is no purposeful plan for development and exploitation.

What we need is private investment, with the real and stark possibilities of roaring success and abject failure that the marketplace provides. And guards at the door, to keep the Government OUT OF THE WAY!


68 posted on 09/30/2008 3:30:10 PM PDT by MainFrame65 (The US Senate: World's greatest PREVARICATIVE body!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

Subsidies like on tobacco here in NC just encouraged farmers not to put the land to use growing something that would sell and benefit themselves and others.


69 posted on 09/30/2008 3:31:39 PM PDT by nclaurel (I think therefore I vote Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree
McCain is a real leader on this issue - he even told Iowans to their faces that he doesn't support Ethanol.

Start thinking about the country as a whole, instead of regions or states thinking about themselves.

70 posted on 09/30/2008 3:43:54 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

>>>Screw Iowa and the corn they rode in on!!!!

Screw you too pal. How ‘bout we Iowans quit producing agricultural products...you can eat your shorts.


71 posted on 09/30/2008 3:46:40 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (ESPN MNF: 3 Putzes talking about football on TV while I'm trying to watch a game.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree; Shermy

I’m in Iowa and McCain’s stance on ethanol was one of the few things I liked about him during primary season. It’s a scam, and just because our state benefits from it doesn’t make it right.


72 posted on 09/30/2008 6:35:51 PM PDT by xjcsa (McWhatshisname-Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth
Looks like those folks in Ohio will just have to vote for Obama for their Ethanol money along with the other handouts!

Um...what does this have to do with Ohio?

73 posted on 09/30/2008 6:37:29 PM PDT by xjcsa (McWhatshisname-Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

Ethanol subsidies should be stopped along will all other agricultural subsidies.


74 posted on 09/30/2008 6:40:10 PM PDT by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MainFrame65

**The result has been a WORLD WIDE disruption of food production, with results appearing here as dramatic price increases, but in other parts of the world as shortages, famine, starvation, and death.**

The United States increased food exports last year with the exception of soybeans.

Food disruption and world wide price increases has been more the result of colder than normal weather in southeast Asia and elsewhere and the rise in ALL worldwide commodities prices due to both the low dollar and the effect of high oil prices on production and transportation costs.

What ethanol costs effect the most is domestic meat prices with beef cost per pound rises almost dollar per dollar with the rise in corn prices. Roughly Pork cost per pound will increase about half the cost of beef at around 50 cents per dollar rise in corn price. Chicken will be around half that at increasing 25 cents per dollar rise in corn price.


75 posted on 09/30/2008 6:43:38 PM PDT by Swiss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree

I won’t even get into the issue of subsidies but I think it is a stupid move to use FOOD for fuel.


76 posted on 09/30/2008 6:48:37 PM PDT by just deserts (Washington, Hollywood and Media elites are clinging to their tennis rackets and caffe lattes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree
McCain shouldn't waste his time in Iowa, then.

When in area: Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin, then hop over to Colorado, New Mexico, and Nevada, or fly up to Michigan and Ohio.

And... Mr. McCain, Mr. Danforth! Get the documentation and get the word out about Obama's neo-Marxist co-conspirators. Ask Rudy Giuliani to help you. He knows something about that kind of thing.

77 posted on 09/30/2008 6:49:15 PM PDT by unspun (Tell the truth about Obama to all you know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo

Wasn’t it Fidel Castro that said converting food stocks to fuel is immoral?


78 posted on 09/30/2008 8:52:28 PM PDT by jamndad5 ("I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: o2bfree
Well, not surprisingly, your thread went over like the proverbial lead balloon. ;O)

FWIW, I used E10 exclusively until gasoline went above $3/gallon and the break for E10 stayed at 10¢/gallon. I figure it's enough that I'm subsidizing it through my taxes; I see no need to be subsidizing it at the pump, too. The ONLY good thing about Chet Culver's winning is Jim Nussle didn't get a chance to push for his statewide blend-it-all-with-ethanol mandate.

79 posted on 10/06/2008 2:08:45 PM PDT by newgeezer (Iowan since 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson