Posted on 09/13/2008 1:03:54 AM PDT by bruinbirdman
Pyongyang, September 12 (KCNA) -- Sixty-three years have elapsed since the U.S. imperialists occupied south Korea in September 1945.
The days of the presence of the U.S. imperialist aggression forces in south Korea are a history of blood and shocking crimes.
Ever since they set foot in south Korea, the U.S. imperialists have inflicted all manner of immeasurable misfortunes and disasters upon the people there and killed innocent people at random.
They brutally put down the struggle of the people in different parts of south Korea against the U.S. "military government" in October 1946 by setting in motion planes, tanks and chemical weapons, leaving more than 25,000 people dead.
During the April 3 Popular Uprising against the May 10 separate election in Jeju Island which continued till June 1949 they also slaughtered over 70,000 out of 300,000 islanders by the most brutal methods.
In five years since the occupation of south Korea by the U.S. imperialists, peaceable inhabitants killed by them totaled over a million.
The atrocious massacres against south Koreans by the U.S. imperialist aggression troops continued even in the postwar days, to say nothing of the period of the Korean war.
The endless list of cases of brutal murders committed by the U.S. imperialists includes the shooting of a girl in Kunsan in 1957, the throwing of a boy in a box from a helicopter in Puphyong in February 1958, the shooting of a firewood collector in Phaju in 1962 and a random firing in June 1981.
The murder committed by them in south Korea reached the peak of hysteria during the Kwangju Popular Uprising in May 1980.
On the order of the U.S. imperialists the Chun Doo Hwan group killed more than 5,700 inhabitants of all strata and inflicted light and heavy wounds on 14,000 others in a matter of a few days of the popular uprising in Kwangju.
The brutal murder and crimes of the U.S. imperialist aggression troops in south Korea have never ceased in the new century. The typical case is that they ran an armored car over two young middle school girls, Sin Hyo Sun and Sim Mi Son, on a road in Yangju County, Kyonggi Province in broad daylight on June 13, 2002.
The United States must withdraw its forces from south Korea at once, putting an end to the history of crimes in which it has only imposed misfortunes and sufferings on the south Koreans.
Chia Pet has died, they are trying to stir up some controversy to cover this story for now while they think of what to do.
Wow, the New York Times just keeps getting more shrill by the day.
Oh, you mean this isn’t the NYTimes?? Oops, sorry. Could have sworn it was the NYT.
:-)
I looked at it in the original Korean, and the only thing I got out of it is, "We're hungry!"
I guess it is difficult to get good utility poles up North when the people keep eating the bark off the trees. It must be ronery there at night.
They put out a lot of propaganda to make sure their people won't welcome us as liberators.
I wonder what political party was in power in 1945-46? What political party controlled congress?
If true, who is responsible?
The NYT probably owns and publishes Korea DPRK news.
Harry Reid? Michael Moore? Nancy Pelosi? Obama's writers?
The Korea DPRK news probably owns and publishes the NYT .
Yes, they're *that* stupid.
Cheers!
This could have been written by MSNBC.
What is your question exactly? Who is responsible for what? Surely you don't believe all this BS?
I was one of those US troops in South Korea. A tiny few of us were murderers, but most of us, daresay, were just lazy, drunken, promiscuous, immature trip-wires. Just enough of us sitting there in the primary overland invasion route, just like we did in the Fulda Gap in West Germany. A human minefield forcing invading Commies to bypass the shortcut, since 1953, that’s us.
As someone with a grandfather who was stationed in Korea, I hope Arugula McTeleprompter (D-Rezko) and his handlers decide to expose the, ahem, evils you’re responsible for over there.
And I hope the NYT et al. continue to support him in whatever argument he takes. I don’t think they’d have a single subscription left between NY and LA, and aside from Shitcago, St. Louis, and Denver, I don’t think the socialist would see one county win, much less a state.
Are they trying to lose 40 states?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.