Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cva66snipe
That is true of most cities -- it is pipelined from the refinery.

There was a plan to build more refineries on closed military bases.

I would approve of that as long as:

1. They would be built in other parts of the country -- Carolinas/Georgia/Pennsylvania/Ohio/Indiana/Illinois or some other place. This would mean we did not have all our eggs in one basket (Texas-Louisiana-Mississippi Gulf Coast)
2. Allow for spare capacity so that we are operating at 70% to 80% of capacity.

And I would not mind if the government contracted this out to oil companies to do (I think the government would make a mess of it).

As a taxpayer, I found it very annoying to be gasoline lines in California in the 1970s because of the presidency of Jimmy Carter. I would not mind tax dollars be used to help prevent shortages of gasoline -- even if it is only for a week or two.

21 posted on 09/12/2008 3:57:32 AM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: topher

The FED has plenty of land here that mostly likely would not be suitable for anything else but something like a refinery due to HAZMAT from the Oak Ridge weapons facilities. I’m talking about quite a few thousand acres too. Of course the same Kooks who come here every year to protest the weapons facilities likely wouldn’t like that either.


23 posted on 09/12/2008 4:08:29 AM PDT by cva66snipe ($.01 The current difference between the DEM's and GOP as well as their combined worth to this nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson