1 posted on
09/10/2008 10:20:11 PM PDT by
Chet 99
To: Chet 99
I don't go for the gushing. I keep things in perspective and know McCain is not with us on all the issues. He's still preferable to the other guy for a host of reasons. The principal one being is we don't want to go back to the 1960s.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
2 posted on
09/10/2008 10:23:02 PM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Chet 99
So now Obama says he may not immediately let those high-income tax cuts expire, owing to the troubled economy and all.
maybe because there’s no point in antagonizing the rich elitists from the coasts who hate Palin. They are the only base left and he needs to keep them.
3 posted on
09/10/2008 10:23:41 PM PDT by
ari-freedom
(We never hide from history. We make history!)
To: Chet 99
To: Chet 99
6 posted on
09/10/2008 10:26:00 PM PDT by
Christian4Bush
(No way, No how, NObama! *************McCain/Palin 08************)
To: Chet 99
I wont be comfortable until a poll comes out of Colorado with McCain leading.
12 posted on
09/10/2008 10:30:39 PM PDT by
jerry557
To: Chet 99
Then McCain chose as his running mate a tough-talking Assembly of God woman from Alaska who shoots guns and asserts, albeit dishonestly, that she has opposed wasteful pork-barrel spending in her state. Got any proof that she was dishonest?....Didn't think so..
17 posted on
09/10/2008 10:33:16 PM PDT by
Mogollon
($5/gal Gas....Kick the Jacka$$es Out!)
To: Chet 99
18 posted on
09/10/2008 10:33:21 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: Chet 99
For their part, Republicans suddenly are all fired up again about those supposedly outsider and right-wing reforms they incessantly talk about but never actually get done, such as fiscal responsibility and an end to abortion and the deployment of military that makes quick work of any and all adversaries.Boy he got that right. It's going to be pretty disappointing if this is all smoke and mirrors from the Republicans....again.
20 posted on
09/10/2008 10:34:43 PM PDT by
Chaguito
To: Chet 99
Not a good sign turning to presidential race losers of past.
To: Chet 99
31 posted on
09/10/2008 11:09:47 PM PDT by
television is just wrong
(The Democrats have lost cabin pressure and the oxygen masks have dropped.)
To: Chet 99
Thus the electoral map looks fairly typically red where it counts and blue where it doesn't. I predict California will be red on the electoral map; McCain/Palin winning California. I know, lots of libs on the west coast. Of course SF will go with Obama. But I have a hunch that latinos and moderate dems will go with Palin.
35 posted on
09/10/2008 11:49:36 PM PDT by
roadcat
To: Chet 99
Then McCain chose as his running mate a tough-talking Assembly of God woman from Alaska who shoots guns and asserts, albeit dishonestly, that she has opposed wasteful pork-barrel spending in her state. No dishonesty at all. She has reduced earmark requests from $700 million to less that $200 million - and most of that $200 mil is for continuing projects.
38 posted on
09/11/2008 5:08:42 AM PDT by
dirtboy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson