Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

she's voting McKinney, don't ya know...
1 posted on 08/19/2008 8:43:22 AM PDT by pjsbro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: pjsbro

Wait a minute, she says she is going to vote for What’s her face, but in another post on her web site she chews out Angelina Jolie for not supporting Obama. So who is she really for, Obama, Hillary or Cynthia? The fat lady of the century thinks Republicans consume to much, I guess eating enough to keep 5 people alive doesn’t amount to consumption.


31 posted on 08/19/2008 9:04:05 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pjsbro

I’ve had people blast me before when I complained that a posted article was not news-worthy, or boring. People have told me “Well, you took the time to click on the thread, you must have cared enough to do that...”, so- I’ll save you some time, I’ll blast myself. WHY, why, why did I read the rantings of this complete moron? Why am I taking the time to even respond to words said by someone who should have been under mental evaluation years ago? Roseanne Barr- remind me when it’s 1990 again, so I can take your words as someone who’s actually relevant in society. What’s next- the guy who played the part of the brother of the neighbor on “Kate And Allie” telling us their views on the election?


32 posted on 08/19/2008 9:06:32 AM PDT by richmwill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pjsbro

Republicans are responsible for Katrina? People can criticize Bush and the local politicians for errors after Katrina, but the only thing the congressional republicans did was give away crazy amounts of money in the aftermath of that disaster.


34 posted on 08/19/2008 9:08:32 AM PDT by MovementConservative (John Roberts and Sam Alito.... Thank you GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pjsbro

I am of the strong suspicion that Obama was never intended to win, just to be the only candidate who could defeat Hillary.

To start with, there are powerful and wealthy parts of the Democrat party who bitterly hate the Clintons. Their leader is Al Gore, who was essentially given hundreds of millions of dollars in stock IPOs from his high tech base to defeat Hillary.

They went to the experienced Chicago Daley machine, also anti-Hillary, to get a candidate who had to be black, and had to be far to the left of Hillary, since the DNC delegates are far more leftist than Democrats as a whole, a candidate who had to be totally under the control of the machine, with no “control handle” from anyone else. Obama’s voting record is even to the left of the Socialist senator.

Obama was just the man for this purpose. And he remains so until he is nominated. At which point, more than anything else, he will be kept under heavy armed guard to prevent his being harmed prior to the election.

But the goal is singular. To stop Hillary. They do not really care if he is defeated in the election, and there will be no great effort to get him elected—just to keep him alive. There is a good chance that he could be in a McGovern blowout.

There will be a huge fight at the convention. Both sides are itching for it. If necessary, both sides may even be willing to split the party.

Hillary’s faction, which if it became dominant, would try to purge out the extreme left and those not loyal to Hillary, and claim the mantle of the party, turning it into the Clinton party.

Obama’s faction, would be to further radicalize the party, but at the same time to prevent Hillary from every getting power in the party again.

In either case, their fear and hatred of each other will push them both into a fight, which may spill outdoors. Obama’s supporters will want the mob to act, Hillary’s for the police to brutally suppress them, and thus embarrass Obama.

The critical factor will be if Obama does not win with the first ballot. If so, all delegates will be freed up to vote as they see fit.

The Hillary supporters will demand a roll call vote of every State delegation. This will take many hours and run the schedule into the early morning hours. This is so that if the first ballot fails, the attempt to steal the nomination will be out of prime time.

If they have counted the numbers, intense lobbying will be under way to bribe and threaten the delegates on subsequent ballots, to deny some of the delegates their votes, to change the party rules, and to otherwise jam the works in a way to get their desired outcome.

If Hillary has a chance, at the last minute Al Gore may throw his hat in as a dark horse, to suck away enough of her support to deprive her of the nomination.

“Ugly deeds and dark doings in smoke filled chambers.” This was how things used to be done before television coverage of the conventions.


35 posted on 08/19/2008 9:12:10 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pjsbro
...she is on tape defending sucking the brains out of babies who live through late term abortions

I think Rosanne is confusing two things in that sentence--aborted babies that are born alive and partial birth abortion.

What is she talking about anyway? People that vote Dem don't care about babies and abortion. Everyone knows they are the pro baby killing party. This comes as a shock to who?

From the sounds of her incoherent blog, it sounds like Rosanne has had a few of her brains sucked out.

36 posted on 08/19/2008 9:14:41 AM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pjsbro

Barak Obama has prevented Hillary Clinton from being President for at least four years. In that sense, he is an American hero.


39 posted on 08/19/2008 9:20:39 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pjsbro
I am voting for cynthia mckinney for president.

Not surprising coming from a spitting crotch-grabber. Intelligence is not their forte'.

41 posted on 08/19/2008 9:39:24 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (Choosing between McInsane and Obamapalooza is like choosing to ingest a slow or fast-acting poison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pjsbro

I think we should encourage more principled democratic ambisextrous wimmins to vote their alleged hearts and minds and Vote Cynthia!


43 posted on 08/19/2008 9:41:47 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pjsbro

She may be nuts but she is smart enough to know Hillary could win and Obama can’t.


44 posted on 08/19/2008 10:01:23 AM PDT by Bobalu (If you don't want people pointing out your flaws, maybe you should work on not having any)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pjsbro

Wonder which personality wrote this piece? Just what I want, to be lectured by someone with her mental capacity! *sacarsim*


45 posted on 08/19/2008 10:08:04 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pjsbro
It's rare to find any multi-millionaire seeking to expand the inheritance tax. Apparently, Barr either has no children or hates the ones she does have. Of course, in her deep love for the poor she has not yet given all her money to charity and taken a vow of poverty, has she?


46 posted on 08/19/2008 10:28:51 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson