To: calex59
One question, How would banning “no knock warrants” stop criminals from doing this type of thing? It seems that banning those warrants would only stop the police from serving them. Having them banned will not stop criminals. Just like locks do not stop criminals and so forth and so on.
No argument just a thought!
30 posted on
08/08/2008 10:01:01 AM PDT by
onlylewis
(libs want a two class system, one rich one poor)
To: onlylewis
Easy...
Once banned, I can rest assured it is only criminals I'm shooting coming through my door.
34 posted on
08/08/2008 10:05:54 AM PDT by
Jagdgewehr
(Beware the coming of the Pax Obama!)
To: onlylewis
If no knock warrants are banned, anyone busting down the door is a black hat and well within the ROE. Of course, IMHO, that’s true, anyway.
44 posted on
08/08/2008 10:16:34 AM PDT by
magslinger
(A politician who thinks he is above the law is actually beneath contempt.)
To: onlylewis
It would stop it for one reason. Anyone breaking into a home shouting police when no knock warrants were not allowed, as the constitution forbids them, then no one would be fooled and would shoot a lot sooner. The victims wouldn’t wait until it was to late and criminals would know that. If you can’t see that, then I feel sorry for you.
48 posted on
08/08/2008 10:22:35 AM PDT by
calex59
To: onlylewis
How would banning “no knock warrants” stop criminals from doing this type of thing?Many armed people freeze when they think it is the police. This gives thug invaders an invaluable advantage. The breaking down of the door should be a signal for immediate self-defense, not a government inquiry.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson