Clinton failed to go after Bin LAden...viewed it as a criminal matter despite all evidence to the contrary.
Bush has gone after Al Quida and the terrorists and has severally injured their ability to attack, particularly here in the US and slaughtered tens and hundreds of thousands of them, including amongst their top leadership.
Obama wants it back to a criminal activity and would unilaterally surrender and retreat in one theater while assuring us he will step up to the plate in another theater...which theater (Afgjhanistan) OBTW, when it counted and he was in the Senate, he voted to defund.
So, it is likely, when it counts and he is not simply "campaigning" he will revert to his true ideology and that of his ernest left-wing anti-American supporters and retreat and lose there as well.
McCain's defended and pushed a strategy that has won in Iraqq and will win in Aghanistan, and will go after Al Quida and will continue taking the fight to them. There is no doubt about that and they fear him.
The fact that these enemy terrorist groups all want Obama to win should be enough for any sane American in their decision between the two.
CHOOSING THE NEXT PRESIDENT
THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH ABOUT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA
Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left -by David Horowitz
Amazon Book Review:
"Vastly Illuminating!" September 25, 2004
By Kat Bakhu
"I had long wondered why people on the Left had the propensity to speak more positively about people who would slit their throats than they do about their own country, which affords them more freedom and opportunity than anywhere else. David Horowitz has answered that question thoroughly and convincingly in his Unholy Alliance. Where I felt bewildered and confused, I now feel crystal clear. Unholy Alliance is such a great book.
It begins with the leftist movements at the beginning of the 20th Century, and works its way up to the present day, exploring the anti-American attitude of these movements in detail. Horowitz shows that the enemies of the US back then are largely the same group today, operating under the same misperceptions, making the same mistakes, and pursuing the same impossible utopia.
Individual chapters are included on the Patriot Act (I was persuaded that it is a GOOD thing); the democratic flip-flop on Iraq once G.W. Bush implemented what they agreed with Clinton needed to be done; the driving components of the current anti-war movement; as well as chapters on individual personalities who are major spokespeople of the Left. Horowitz covers a lot of ground, and he covers it concisely and clearly. Unholy Alliance is richly informative without ever being boring or plodding.
This book is so illuminating that I simply cannot do justice to it here. I love people who reason so clearly that they help me get my own reasoning clear. Horowitz is just that type of person! In the terrain of mindless clichés (no-blood-for-oil, etc.), he is a breath of real fresh air."
$27.00
http://www.amazon.com/Unholy-Alliance-Radical-Islam-American/dp/089526076X
Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left -by David Horowitz
Not all dissent is equal, and Americans whose actions are calculated to give aide and comfort to the butchers who murdered 3,000 innocent people on September 11, 2001 are not patriotic at all... they are, in fact, quite the opposite.
$18.00 from David Horowitz's website, FrontPageMag.com:
https://secure.donationreport.com/productlist.html?key=WOWRPR5ZNKR8
_______________________________________________________________
Regarding the 911 attacks..."Why did it take a bunch of Arabs to do what you all should have done a long time ago?"
August, 2003: Ward Churchill Caught On Tape Advocating Terrorism [vs Fellow Americans]
Audio link at Michell Malkin's website (included below)
Question from audience:
You mentioned a little bit ago, "Why did it take a bunch of Arabs to do what you all should have done a long time ago," that's my question.
Churchill: I'm gonna repeat that, tell me if I got that right: Why shouldn't we do something and how do you you move so they don't see you coming.
As to the first part, not a reason in the world that I could see. I can't find a single reason that you shouldn't in a principled way —there may be some practical considerations, such as do you know how (laughter from audience)
—you know, often these things are processes. It's not just an impulse. And certainly it's not just an event.
And the simple answer, although it probably should be more complicated, but I'm not being flip and giving the simple answer, is:
You carry the weapon. That's how they don't see it coming. You're the one...
They talk about "color blind or blind to your color." You said it yourself.
You don't send the Black Liberation Army into Wall Street to conduct an action.
You don't send the American Indian Movement into downtown Seattle to conduct an action.
Who do you send? You. Your beard shaved, your hair cut close, and wearing a banker's suit.
There's probably a whole lot more to it, you know that. But there's where you start. .."
more...
Audio link at:
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/001588.htm
.
I will NEVER FORGET seeing MONSOOR IJAZ going on FoX News Channel the day after 9/11 to tell us that the previous day’s attacks could have been avoided.
Avoided, if only the CLINTON White House had not refused the 3 free offers he had personally brokered with the Sudan during the 1990’s to give us OSAMA bin LADEN on a silver platter,
...before he could hit us real hard here at home a la 9/11.
.
Years later it was...
Freeper Alert: MONSOOR IJAZ gets PRIVATE 9/11 Testimony, demands IN PUBLIC
http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1117043/posts
Still, to NO avail.
.