Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wind turbine marketers are full of hot air
Globe and Mail Update ^ | July 11, 2008 | Neil Reynolds

Posted on 07/25/2008 8:23:14 AM PDT by twistedwrench

Republican presidential candidate Senator John McCain travelled to Oregon in mid-May to deliver the definitive climate change speech of his campaign. He spoke in Portland, at the U.S. headquarters of Vestas Wind Systems AS, a Danish company that markets wind turbines around the world. He started on a self-deprecating note. “Today is a kind of test run for this company,” he said. “They've got wind technicians here, wind studies and all these wind turbines. But there's no wind. So now I know why they asked me to come and give a speech.”

It was perhaps his most perceptive statement of the day. Five sentences later, Mr. McCain made perhaps his least perceptive. “Wind,” he said, “is a predictable source of energy.”

(Excerpt) Read more at theglobeandmail.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; environment; enviroprofiteering; powerfantasies; shysters; wind; windpower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
“Not a single conventional power plant has been closed in the period that Danish wind farms have been developed,” he says. “Because of the intermittency and variability of the wind, conventional power plants have had to be kept running at full capacity to meet the actual demand for electricity and to provide backup.”
1 posted on 07/25/2008 8:23:14 AM PDT by twistedwrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: twistedwrench

It also needs to be noted that Germany is moving away from wind power as it is the LEAST predictable source.

Good for backing up back-up power systems, but little else.


2 posted on 07/25/2008 8:30:07 AM PDT by M1Tanker (Proven Daily: Modern "progressive" liberalism is just National Socialism without the "twisted cross")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twistedwrench

Mccain has to quit the self depracation and stop pandering to the obama voters green fantasies.


3 posted on 07/25/2008 8:30:38 AM PDT by omega4179 (B.Hussein Keep the change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twistedwrench

True. The last AWEA -the wind lobby- conference was held in Houston. Windenergy and most photovoltaic had to be constantly backed up, and the only power stations that can vary their production so rapidly are gas powered ones.

Behind wind and electric solar you have the same oil and gas companies that you find behind the pump at your gas station.


4 posted on 07/25/2008 8:31:16 AM PDT by J Aguilar (Veritas vos liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twistedwrench

...we recently fought off corporate wind farms here in the beautiful mountains of North Carolina...those eyesore towers stand 38 stories tall and make a noise like somebody swinging a rope over your head....the wind enthusiasts will keep on trying though....the tax credit money is simply too lucrative....that’s why before it’s demise, Enron was the largest wind farm company in the US.


5 posted on 07/25/2008 8:33:49 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twistedwrench

If we learn to curb our electrically needs to when the winds blows we’d be fine. Ain’t gonna happen. Power plants produce energy whether it’s used or not.


6 posted on 07/25/2008 8:34:00 AM PDT by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: J Aguilar

” Windenergy and most photovoltaic had to be constantly backed up, and the only power stations that can vary their production so rapidly are gas powered ones.”
...which may be why Boone Pickens is jumping into windfarms....I hear he’s a big investor in gas.


7 posted on 07/25/2008 8:36:50 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: stevio

“If we learn to curb our electrically needs to when the winds blows we’d be fine. Ain’t gonna happen.”

yep...here in the South, peak demand occurs during the hottest part of the day...and that’s often when the wind quits blowing.


8 posted on 07/25/2008 8:42:04 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: omega4179
Mccain has to quit the self depracation and stop pandering to the obama voters green fantasies.

He should be more pompous like Kerry, Algore, O'Bama.

9 posted on 07/25/2008 8:46:06 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stevio
Power plants produce energy whether it’s used or not.

Not true.

Every electric power producer has large power plants that run almost all of the time called Base Load plants.

Then they have medium sized plants that increase or decrease power production to meet rising or falling demand called Load Following plants.

Then there are plants that are started up only when demand is at its greatest called Peaking Plants. Some of these are gas turbine plants that are fully automated and can be started remotely from a Systems Operation Center.

It would be economically wasteful to generate power that was not used and it would cause destructive imbalances in the distribution system.

10 posted on 07/25/2008 8:47:16 AM PDT by Pontiac (Your message here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: twistedwrench
Our Congressman, Jerry McNerney(D), is a wind generation expert. He might have a lot to do with those eyesore turbines over the Altamont Pass here in California.

We're hoping the winds of change blow him right out of office this November. We have a good conservative candidate with name recognition running against him by the name of Dean Andal(R).

11 posted on 07/25/2008 8:47:17 AM PDT by bubbacluck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twistedwrench

Wind (and solar) power can be stored, to better match supply and demand — at a cost.

Aye, there’s the rub. For in that dream of renewable energy, what costs may come? When we have shuffled off oil, must give us pause .... And makes us rather bear those energy sources we have than fly to others that we know not of?


12 posted on 07/25/2008 8:49:59 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I live in Washington state on the Columbia River and they are putting wind turbines everywhere the wind blows. Fine and dandy, but it is nothing but a show of a little and not enough. McCain needs to visit the Alaska feilds, Anwar, and the drilling oil rigs and let Americans KNOW he will do everything and’s all to stop foreign dependence on oil. The President’s announcement the other day let the Middle East know their cash cow was about the play out....the numbers on oil a barrell are still dropping....$123.33 as we speak. The MSM calls this drop due to the economy, stupid! Nothing political about them is there?????


13 posted on 07/25/2008 8:52:13 AM PDT by cousair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: twistedwrench
This blows.
14 posted on 07/25/2008 8:55:27 AM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

Someone should tell the Danes this then.


15 posted on 07/25/2008 8:56:21 AM PDT by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

Instead of tying the wind generators into the grid, wouldn’t it be feasible to use the energy to produce hydrogen (and oxygen) through hydrolysis? Then you wouldn’t care so much about the intermittent wind. You would also not need the sophisticated electronics to synchronize the wind generators with the grid.

Just a thought.


16 posted on 07/25/2008 8:58:24 AM PDT by 109ACS (Humpty Dumpty was pushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 109ACS

hydrogen Society will come - question is not if - but when.


17 posted on 07/25/2008 9:01:35 AM PDT by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: twistedwrench
Gee - I guess this dashes the hopes of all those Obamaiacs that hoped he would appoint Boone Pickens as Energy Secretary.

Damn shame, Boone needs the money....[/sarc]

18 posted on 07/25/2008 9:08:00 AM PDT by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac; stevio
Last week I went to the opening of the newest power plant in the West. It is a dual cycle natural gas turbine combined with steam boiler technology. It is a 600 Megawatt plant. It is now the base load plant for our area. It is taking over from four steam natural gas/oil plants that date back to the late 60’s and forward. The new plant is 50% efficient, the old plants are 32% efficient - catch is they are ONLY that efficient in a narrow operating range. Either side of that range and they become very inefficient - as if 32% was not bad enough. So they replaced 32% efficient with 50% and it is now the base load. Not a bad deal in my book.

Incidentally we in Northern Nevada have very good wind conditions, one of my neighbors has four wind turbines to run his house. They are backed up by batteries and solar with emergency tap to the gird. He has to go one the grid about twice a month during the winter and once a month in the Summer.

19 posted on 07/25/2008 9:15:25 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Constantly choosing the lesser of two evils is still choosing evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: twistedwrench
I think a wind generator is fine for a homeowner, small business etc, to try and save a few bucks on thier electric bill. However wind at best will be a very small contributer to any major USA grid. I'd say dido solar but solar has potential so maybe solar will someday be a big contributor.

I like nukes, but I've heard that it costs more to decommission a nuke plant then it cost to build and operate it. Not sure if this is true, but if it is then nukes might not be all that great of an idea either. Maybe coal with really good environmental controls is our best option.

20 posted on 07/25/2008 9:17:51 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson