[Interposition]

I really appreciate your numerous, accurate posts on this thread:

Your post #76 about "double effect" should help many folk. It seems self-evident; but a few need the concept illustrated in an analogy they can relate to. And even then, they need time to think it over. The difficulty seems related to a hands-off God’s Will policy, where both must share life or death. They think "double effect" is related to situational ethics; and in a moment of crisis, make a regretful decision.

Your post #77 about the A.M.A work was referenced in post #88, note 2 on this thread.

And your post #79 “in ventre sa mere” has a pro-life article with that phrase in the title. ¹

The candid citizen must admit your lifesaving & mind-changing posts are pro bono publico! May your tribe increase exponentially and your opposition convert, or decrease by the same order of magnitude.

1 http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51345 The unalienable right to life in ventre sa mere "An infant in ventre sa mere, or in the mother's womb, is supposed in law to be born for many purposes." – Sir William Blackstone, "Commentaries on the Laws of England," Vol. I, p. 126 (1765)

[Mrs. Don-o]

Thank you for the many blessings! If you want my tribe to literally increase, you'll have to pray for my sons to give me grandchildren! But not TOO soon: they're just 15 and 18. :o)

I appreciate your mother-and-baby-loving heart.