Posted on 07/17/2008 4:09:20 PM PDT by markomalley
Washington, Jul. 17, 2008 (CWNews.com) - Under a policy proposed by the Bush White House, the US government would require all recipients of federal health-care payments to certify that they do not discriminate against doctors or nurses who refuse to be involved in abortions.
New White House policies, circulated for comment this week, would ask all institutions receiving federal health-care grants to provide written assurance that they will not fire-- or refuse to hire-- health-care personnel who express moral objections to abortion.
The proposed guidelines extend to some abortifacient drugs that are commonly identified simply as contraceptives. They regulation circulated by the White House seeks protection for doctors and nurses who express moral objections to the use of "any of the various procedures — including the prescription, dispensing and administration of any drug or the performance of any procedure or any other action — that results in the termination of the life of a human being in utero between conception and natural birth, whether before or after implantation.”??
Cool!
The MSM/Libs will do the same mis-information campaign they use on the stem cell taxpayer funding issue... they'll say "Bush proposes ban on abortions".
Could be an interesting dilemma for some companies which are located in states which force health care workers to do exactly what the feds say they can’t discriminate against.
Oh, the libs ain’t gonna like that at all! They SAY they believe in Freedom of Choice, but it seems that’s ONLY for women to CHOOSE to kill their babies.
Actually, it's worse:
Bush Proposal to Change Abortion Definition
Democrats Argue Bush Administration Changes Would Limit Access to Contraception
Lies all lies.
Bush is a RINO
McCain is a RINO
A vote for Obama is a vote for the unborn!
ping for your lists
huh????
“{Good news...if it is able to pass into regulation. “
Yes, good news. But why wasn’t this down 7 years ago with a Republican held Congress?
You forgot your sarcasm tags.
Yes, IF it is passed. I sure hope so. It seems the only protected behavior and/or ideas are the ones that harm people.
The class of 98 never needs sarcasm tags.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
This is as it should be. The government is not in the business of reading people’s souls or interfering with their moral beliefs, though many pinheaded bureaucrats do try. Such a law will clarify the types of limits on government which should be there anyway.
“A vote for Obama is a vote for” KILLING “the unborn!”
I fixed your mistake.
lol
This would be great.Shame we kill our kids in America.I would also like to see President Bush to get us vouchers for schools other than public before he leaves and give the public a real choice.Spoil us a little Mr.President.
Pro-Life PING
Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
Wow!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.