Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 550 Tons of Yellowcake
American Thinker ^ | 7/8/08 | Randall Hoven

Posted on 07/08/2008 10:35:21 AM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: 17th Miss Regt
Slightly different math in my break down:

550 metric tones = 1212542 lbs.

Yellowcake is 70-90% Triuranium octoxide by weight., so that would be 848779.4 to 1091287.8 lbs of U3O8.

U3O8  has a molecular weight of 842.08193, of which 714.08673 is Uranium ( 84.8%).

So we are talking about 719764.9312 to 925412.0544 lbs of Uranium atoms by weight.

U235 is naturally 0.7204% of Uranium isotopes. So that makes 5185.19 to 6666.67 lbs of U235.

There was 141.0957 lbs of Uranium 235 in the core of the Little Boy Atomic Bomb.

So we are talking about 36 to 47 fission style nuclear weapons with a yield of 13 to 16 kilotons.

21 posted on 07/08/2008 12:42:44 PM PDT by arfan (Think Critically... Act Decisively... Reflect Constantly...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: arfan

Your math is probably better. I was not sure that yellowcake was U3O8. I also see that you have a significantly different quantity for the core weight. Mine was a crude estimate. But we both come out with the same answer: quite a few bombs.


22 posted on 07/08/2008 12:50:34 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pissant
UMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM......550 tons of YELLOW CAKE with CHOCOLATE FROSTING!!!!!
23 posted on 07/08/2008 1:41:34 PM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Actually, the real news is the movement of the yellowcake, not it’s existence. I wouldn’t be surprised if we use it ourselves for nuclear energy...which I am not opposed to. We’ll let the Canucks hold it for a while so all the tree huggers won’t be upset that we might go ahead and build nuclear power plants, then at a later date we’ll bring it into the US.


24 posted on 07/09/2008 10:13:43 AM PDT by brooklyn dave (VOTE SOCIALIST VOTE OBAMA (that's what he is, isn't he?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: brooklyn dave
Why is this all considered so important right now?

It has always been important - not just right now. It's just news because it got moved.

One thing it should prove to the Paulites and the liberals is that we needed to go into Iraq and get rid of Saddam.

Of course, neither group will ever admit that.

25 posted on 07/25/2008 2:20:23 PM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson