Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Federalist Papers: The Key to Restoring Our Constitutional Republic
Sutherland Institute ^ | Unknown | John Eidsmoe, Professor of Constitutional Law

Posted on 07/05/2008 2:43:18 PM PDT by Interposition

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: kingattax

Keep up the good work guys.


41 posted on 07/05/2008 10:27:25 PM PDT by Pikachu_Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Interposition

ping


42 posted on 07/05/2008 10:31:12 PM PDT by Cruz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
Love your tagline.

And just for the sake of argument, the Anti's were right about a lot more than the Federalists were.

Hope you're having a wonderful 4th.

Best,

L

43 posted on 07/05/2008 10:43:20 PM PDT by Lurker (Islam is an insane death cult. Any other aspects are PR, to get them within throat-cutting range.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Excuse me? Why are you “focusing” on my post? If you don’t like it, ignore it.


44 posted on 07/06/2008 4:09:41 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Only a Kennedy between us and tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Just because...

Sometimes when you get down to playground politics, it helps those who are a bit...challenged...

BTW, there are a lot more lies out there than just this one I suppose...There are memory cashes that Free Republic has around here that could fill up a few volumes...


45 posted on 07/06/2008 6:11:33 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast; stevie_d_64
Why are you “focusing” on my post?

My comment was intended as sarcasm. Sorry if you were offended or didn't understand.

ML/NJ

46 posted on 07/06/2008 6:27:29 AM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Sorry, muh bad...I kinda felt the edge of your “sarc”, but it was early...

I forgot my own “/sarc”...

Bad steve!!! Bad steve...

I do have an excuse...No coffee yet...


47 posted on 07/06/2008 6:35:40 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Interposition; ExTexasRedhead

Thanks for posting this. BTW, welcome to FR.


48 posted on 07/06/2008 6:37:19 AM PDT by Arrowhead1952 (A vote for any Democrat from BO on down the ticket is a vote for $10 a gallon gas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interposition
Excellent!

"The Federalist," published as "A Commentary On The Constitution Of The United States Consisting Of A Collection Of Essays, Written In Support Of The Constitution Agreed Upon By the Federal Convention On September 17, 1787," was a "collection of 85 essays which make up The Federalist originally published anonymously in New York newspapers during the Fall of 1787 and the Spring of 1788 as a means of convincing the citizens of the State of New York of the advantages of their ratifying the new Constitution. Each was addressed 'To the People of the State of New York.' In 1788 they wee published in a two-volume edition for use in the ratification process in the other states. They were accepted by the people of the founding generation as accurate expositions of the meaning and intent of the Constitution.

"As a matter of fact, they were among those documents which the Board of Visitors of the University of Virginia in 1825 directed to be used as the text for its law school in its studies of "the general principles of liberty and the rights of man." "The Federalist," the Board minutes indicate, "constitute 'an authority to which appeal is habitually made by all, and rarely declined or denied by any as evidence of the general opinion of those who framed, and of those who accepted the Constitution of the U. S., on questions as to its genuine meaning.'" (Quoted from Thomas Jefferson's record of the Board of Visitors meeting)

The above paragraphs are quoted from "Our Ageless Constitution," P. 225, as a preface to reprinted portions of "The Federalist." OAC is a 320-page 1987 Bicentennial Volume honoring the philosophy and principles of the U. S. Constitution.

49 posted on 07/06/2008 12:35:02 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

William, The Slick, of Arkansas should have been impeached and removed the day he issued that E.O. That’s far more solid grounds for removal than the one he was finally impeached for. But that misses the major point that he should not have been elected to any public office in this country. The electorate is politically and morally insane.


50 posted on 07/06/2008 6:17:13 PM PDT by Interposition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson