Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reno232
Yes, of course you are right, I spent 15-20 hours a week from early August last year until the primary race ended reading and researching, mainly first hand accounts and videos, the various candidates so I could be ignorant of them.

I don't know what the pundits knew, they may have known everything about the man and, like it seems several folks even on FR were doing as well, were either willing to overlook it or had some more expedient reason. Given the comprise nature of the Conservative movement and more over the GOP over the past few election cycles, maybe they were looking to win via pretty and attractive again, instead of actually sticking to Conservative values which we will ultimately have to do again, once McCain or Obama wreck things enough to get us back to Carter like conditions. Maybe that will snap few heads around since we have had it so good for so long. Or maybe there were other more base reasons driving their support. Only they know, but it did seem rather odd considering the data I reviewed. I deal in raw fact, and raw info, that is what I saw, about all the Candidates, and given his own words and actions, some where a compromise was made.

Anyways, speaking of the pundits, I think expediency was the flavor of the day. Egads, Hannity, the poor bastard, was fawning over Rudy. You think he was ignorant of Rudy's positions? I don't, and yet Mr. Conservative went out of his way to give him a platform. So the judgment of the “pundits" leaves me a bit flat.

I consider FR a good cross section of the mostly uncomprised Conservative faithful. Why did it take everyone dropping save McCain and Mitt to to get Romney to register in the on line polls. Something to ponder. Remember these polls occurred after your pundit friends were fawning over the man.

As far as eating our own, I think that is about to end, though the mechanism of that end scares me. Things have been good for many years economically and politically. Under those conditions people have time for pet concerns, for comprimse and flirtations with glamor candidates and bright shiny objects. They have time to look past deep driving principles to compromise, to not rock the boat. Those times are quickly drawing to a close. When things take their final downturn, there will be a cry to fix it, like we did in 1980. Maybe then a true Conservative will get a hearing, maybe then people will actually get serious about doing what is right, not what is flavor of the day.

339 posted on 07/02/2008 2:09:19 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (Haley Barbour 2012, Because he has experience in Disaster Recovery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]


To: ejonesie22

Isn’t it amazing they all trot out the same talking points ? It’s like they all share the same central hive-brain (and a very puny one at that).

Seeing Ann Coulter’s name mentioned ad infinitum, it’s well worth remembering she openly sabotaged Fred’s campaign from the start and embarrassingly fell under the spell of *omney. She’s one of the reasons why we ended up with McCain as the nominee. I’ve never been able to figure out why she’s so well regarded by Conservatives, especially on FR, when she was taken in so effortlessly by a flim-flam man. If he had been fat, bald, and unattractive, would she have seen through him then ?


370 posted on 07/02/2008 6:23:34 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson