Just curious? Why are you hung up on geology, when you are arguing the case for BIOLOGICAL evolution. Do you think association gains respect. Think Hillary and Obama for a good example against.
Do you know how thick a typical containment wall is, in a nuclear reactor? Do you know how many layers of additional containment exist in them. I hope you know, so we figure out how to make a good containment vessel for the nuclear waste.
The guys planning it are going to screw up, so we must rescue the world? They are bound to be embeciles, or worse, they may even be CHRISTIANS!
I don't claim to be a "scientist". I just graduated from kindergarten, and they gave me pass on the rest. I do have a modicum of intelligence, but I won't presume to second guess those working on the problem. I will give little thought to the subject, because, "in the end it really doesn't matter."
We either become dust for eternity, or part of God's family!
"
We either become dust for eternity, or part of God's family!" And that is exactly what has them in a tizzy. They have no idea how to join that family, (even though it is spelled out as plain as day in colors that they cannot see) so they try to rationalize it out of existence.
Just curious? Why are you hung up on geology, when you are arguing the case for BIOLOGICAL evolution. I am arguing the case against taking an ancient religious testament, written by the hand of man and subject to the limitations of the language it was written in, translated by man and subject to errors of translation and yet another set of linguistic limitations, and accepting as absolute truth whatever thought reading those words according the the meaning you ascribe to them puts into your head, and refusing to reconcile that with the testament of the creation you and that book exist in.