Where did I say anything about "inorgaic becoming organic"?
If we're going to teach people that our decision to spend billions of dollars building that facility at Yucca Mountain was just "a guess", and the basis of that guess is no more valid than any other proposal or theory anyone else might have, how do we justify building it there, or not building it anywhere else?
Would you accept the federal government telling you they've decided to build it right next to your house because they say threw a dart at a map and trusted God to guide it?
In order for things to evolve, they must begin. To claim that evolutionary theory shouldn't be involved with that is bogus, and is another STRAW MAN argument. If you prefer, I will just call it "smoke and mirrors". Obfuscation of the subject, without proper doctrinal support from your thesis, does not further your position.
In order for life to progress, it must begin, AND there must be something to begin with. If there is nothing, I repeat NOTHING, it cannot become something. The science we call physics is based on that fact. If it starts with nothing, and becomes something of the supposed mass of all the things we see displayed in the heavens and on earth, it is IMPROBABLE, not impossible, that it could happen. Add to that the suggestion that inorganic matter can suddenly become organic, and then proceed through countless supposedly infinitesimal, incremental changes from simple to complex, into such as God's ultimate Creation, man.
FRiend, that is faith, extraordinary faith.
But, with God, all things are possible. Would you like the Scripture quotation?