Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LTCJ
A point of order. Virtually none of these people are POWs and have no rights as such. They are illegal combatants under the law of war and according to international treaty could be executed with no legal repercussions. Any pretender to the position of Commander and Chief should not only be aware of this but damned well willing to carry it out.

You're not going to get any beef from me over that.  I've been making the same point for months.  The point is, even if you address this as if they were lawful combatants, John is dead wrong.  And if you recognize them as the unlawful combatants they are, he's a flat out moron for trying to advocate for their 'due process' rights.

We hold these people as long as we want.  End of story.  If we were to push for execution, I do think it reasoned to give them a military trial, definately not a civil trial.

27 posted on 06/25/2008 9:22:17 AM PDT by DoughtyOne ( I say no to the Hillary Clinton wing of the Republican party. Not now or ever, John McCain...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
Yes, I may have skimmed over it but a military hearing is in order before execution of unlawful combatants. We're on the same page here.

Any way you look at it, the rule of law is going out the window and it's going to get much worse no matter who wins in November.

28 posted on 06/25/2008 10:08:08 AM PDT by LTCJ (God Save the Constitution - Tar/Feathers '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson