Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rarestia

Wouldn’t frozen CO2 (dry ice) also disappear though? Do we know it was WATER ice and not dry ice?


2 posted on 06/20/2008 6:42:30 PM PDT by RockinRight (I just paid $63 for gas. An icefield in Alaska is NOT the Grand Canyon. F--- the caribou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RockinRight

Per the NASA press release today, it’s not cold enough for dry ice to last as long as this ice did:

http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/06_20_pr.php

“The key new evidence is that chunks of bright material exposed by digging on June 15 and still present on June 16 had vaporized by June 19. “This tells us we’ve got water ice within reach of the arm, which means we can continue this investigation with the tools we brought with us,” said Mark Lemmon of Texas A&M University, College Station, lead scientist for Phoenix’s Surface Stereo Imager camera. He said the disappearing chunks could not have been carbon-dioxide ice at the local temperatures because that material would not have been stable for even one day as a solid.”


3 posted on 06/20/2008 6:44:04 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RockinRight
"Wouldn’t frozen CO2 (dry ice) also disappear though? Do we know it was WATER ice and not dry ice?"

Same question asked on the NASA photo blog. The answer is that the air temperature in the Martian summer (which is now) is much too high for solid CO2 to exist---it has long already vaporized--so what is left pretty much HAS to be water ice.

7 posted on 06/20/2008 6:55:10 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson