“You are correct, this is the lawyer that is a regular guest in the Nancy Grace mob.”
However, deport said nothing about Nancy Grace. Apparently you wanted to add that to his ‘words’ , and are trying to imply that it is proof of guilt.
Which is why you have repeated it about ten times.
So, if you don’t know, and no one else mentioned it, why even throw that in?
A little sensationalism, a little hyperbole?
Why not add you don’t know if she was the one that supported the witch burning trials?
Rather ‘ironic’ considering many of your posts.
Somethings and some posters you just ignore..... They aren’t worth the effort.
I was clear I didn’t know and it was a direct reflection of the transcripts and her behavior with Nancy’s behavior now and in the past. Is Nancy right on this but wrong on that? We will never know since she has never publically apologized for condemning the Duke Lacrosse players. Seems her MO is the jump around, create hysteria, and create ratings combining those Malonis’s trying to reach for a few crumbs of air time. I think they are relational and should be considered when considering the efforts by the lawyer. Had she not been a regular on Nancy’s show contributing the wild assertions and allegations that are likely untrue at this point; perhaps she would be a legitimate source to look at.
Like I said early in the thread, first post of mine perhaps. I was actually excited from the headline and the first paragraph that perhaps someone cracked and was going to spill the beans. As I read on, I found out I was let down again. Still no charges, still no evidence of actual crimes that have been wildly speculated on here and in the media.