Yeah. Can’t say I blame ya.
If I was exhibiting dual personalities like you have, one a logical, courteous person discussing the legality of the issues, the other a Drama Queen who screams “Nancy Grace” over, and over, I wouldn’t want to be held accountable to the words I write in a public Forum.
At least not all of them.
or
‘keyboard pixel jockies with prisms creating from cognitive dissonance,’
?
Duel personalities? Projecting again? Give it up. I am always the same. Always have a smile on my face, and never get mad. I get a kick out of you personally. You are about as funny as they come and have the knack of projecting yourself quite well like you just did. I accused you once before of being duel personalities and your little backstage PM to someone else was exactly what I knew. You exposed yourself. One side is logical and courteous and one side is wild eyed and way out there in space.
As far as I go, this boring old constitutional conservative, is pretty much the same all the time. I can’t argue in circles with people viewing a situation through a religious bigotry prism or a government is God prism logically. Suffice to say, at least I know from your PM to another poster that you mistakenly sent to me, that I get to you a bit. Yep, I repeat myself often because I am dead right on the little issue here. You want to give Nancy Graces’ star liar, oopps, I mean star lawyer credit for doing what none of the 100’s of other lawyers are doing - so be it. I am going to set the record straight on who she is. Period. I might have to do it again even. When I see someone giddy on the prospect that malfeasance towards young girls took place, I am going to call people on that giddiness. Like it or not. I call a foot a foot, a shoe a shoe, and if the shoe fits I say that person oughta wear it.
Anyway nice try, do it again in the mirror.