Do you think they just sweep up everyone they see and sort things out later like a bunch of locusts eating everything in sight? That is Bush derangement thinking.
I guarantee each capture has some information about why and where.
I trust the military enough for that.
Why don’t you?
One of the petitioners, Mohamed Nechla, requested at his CSRT hearing that the Government contact his employer. The petitioner claimed the employer would corroborate Nechla’s contention he had no affiliation with al Qaeda. Although the CSRT determined this testimony would be relevant, it also found the witness was not reasonably available to testify at the time of the hearing. Petitioner’s counsel, however, now represents the witness is available to be heard. See Brief for Boumediene Petitioners 5. If a detainee can present reasonably available evidence demonstrating there is no basis for his continued detention, he must have the opportunity to present this evidence to a habeas corpus court. Even under the Court of Appeals’ generousconstruction of the DTA, however, the evidence identified by Nechla would be inadmissible in a DTA review proceeding. The role of an Article III court in the exercise of its habeas corpus function cannot be circumscribed in this manner.
Once again, take your argument up with the Secretary of the Navy who decided to write rules for the conduct of the hearings that denied the detainee a fair opportunity to present his case.