Now, if he had been born outside the US to a single US citizen parent, then based on when he was born (because this law changed 4 or 5 times in the 20th century), certain rules apply, basically revolving around how old the single US citizen parent was and how long they had resided in the US propr to the birth of the child.
In that case, there may be a problem with Obama.
But, until it is proven that he was born outside the US, then his birth in Hawaii in 1961 qqualifies him.
As you know, there are several doubts about his being born in the USA, including his Kenyan grandma’s insistence he was born over there.
And flaws with the birth certificate. IncludIng perhaps the certificate being dated four days after his given birth date.
Easily explainable but which also corresponds to what I had heard that he was born in Kenya because mother could not board a flight in her late stage of pregnancy and had to wait till he was born then flew into Hawaii and registered him as born there. Truthfully giving his real date of birth but fudging the rest.
Explains, perhaps, why she was apparently,in a seedy hotel at the time. Immediately after her arrival? Why not at her parents’ home?
Unanswered questions breed perhaps wild but still valid speculation that Obama does not seem able or willing to put to rest, so they continue, with his leftist supporters like the kos website trying to divert us with somewhat questionable copies of a birth - or simply “live birth” certificate that has the number redacted, perhaps to avoid a closer examination at source.
You have possibly put part of this to rest - if he were truly born in Hawaii - but even that is not crystal clear, so doubts still swirl around. Valid or not remains to be seen.
My doubts are NOT aimed to offset the HUGE flaws of the Clintons, who may well be much worse or at bests equally troubling.