Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wolfcreek

>> You must also realize the slippery slope of having a *religious* group in our state who is or may be openly violating the laws of said Constitution.

I don’t have any problem with prosecuting lawbreakers, as long as evidence gathering is done in accordance with our constitution and the rule of law is followed scrupulously.

I have a big problem with over-reaching government agencies playing nanny out of “belief” and relying on false reports to deprive citizens of their rights.

I recall that, in this case, a TX appeals court and the TX supreme court said that the law was NOT followed.

I don’t believe that these two courts found CPS in disregard of the law out of favoritism to FLDS or a desire to “let them slide”. Do you?


215 posted on 06/11/2008 2:57:54 PM PDT by Nervous Tick (I've left Cynical City... bound for Jaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]


To: Nervous Tick

You know how they kept calling this case(s) unprecedented? Well, it was. Especially for some Lady judge (a conservative lady judge BTW) in Podunk,Tx.

Her over reaction is a good example why women shouldn’t be President but,shows how women are genetically tuned to care for and protect the young.

I’m happy the Constitution was upheld and the rules of engagement are set for next time something like this arises. And believe me, there will other situations.


280 posted on 06/12/2008 4:13:23 AM PDT by wolfcreek (I see miles and miles of Texas....let's keep it that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson