Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nervous Tick
However, when YOU say “Don’t ever post to me again... I think that would be best” — which I certainly interpreted as a threat — it’s out of bounds to call it like I see it.

I stated what I would like. This is my actual post:

I would like for you to not post to me ever again. After you vile post to me a few days ago, I think that would be for the best.

If that is threatening to you, so be it. I really don't care.

121 posted on 06/11/2008 9:17:34 AM PDT by JRochelle (Keep sweet means shut up and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]


To: JRochelle

>> If that is threatening to you, so be it.

It wasn’t a threat that I took seriously (that should be clear).

But it’s also very clear, to me and others, that you intended it as a veiled threat. I can understand that you don’t wish to admit it, but that doesn’t change the fact.


131 posted on 06/11/2008 9:51:31 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (I've left Cynical City... bound for Jaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson