[Robert DeLong]

Since you are new here can you give us some insight into why you chose to post this? Thanks.

It certainly is not a site I would enjoy other than to say I am glad they are mad at the Democratic Party and I hope that anger hurts the Democrats in the election.

[Petronski]

Any idea what the PUMA stands for?

[sirchtruth]

It isn’t the party that made social security sacred. It is the party that might very well start tinkering with it because the young and well off don’t understand the concept of shared responsibility and insurance.

This is the most delusional, realistic statement I've ever run across in my life. First of all the only reason SS would begin to be "sacred" to anyone is because people who just can't wiat to get their checks each mouth are too lazy and stupid to have ever invested the same money of their own even in a simple savings account in any bank in the country which would have yeilded them more interest than the absolute dismal failure of the gov't run SS account. The program is and has always been an absolute ripp off! Secondly, "shared responsibility" should not be a forced gov't wage garnishment program. Private Insurance in any other form blows SS away in terms of growth and equity leaving the abysmal failure of SS maturation sorely lacking.

When it comes to economic matters liberals are just downright complete dumbasses because of their selfish, lazy nature.