After all, she could just give him a copy of her book to read in 12 years or so.
__________________________________________________
She could...
1. If she could find him...
2. If he could read...otherwise why bother ???
3. If she was allowed to communicate with him..Nah..Probably not...
4. If he hasnt been tossed out on the street and lost or dead or on drugs...
After all, she could just give him a copy of her book to read in 12 years or so. She could... 1. If she could find him... 2. If he could read...otherwise why bother ??? 3. If she was allowed to communicate with him..Nah..Probably not... 4. If he hasnt been tossed out on the street and lost or dead or on drugs...
Three more reasons why entering a picture of her as a victim has nothing to do with determining the fitness of Mr. and Mrs. Jessop to retain parental rights to their newborn son. If she were unlikely to have contact with him or them, what difference would it make that she suffered a sexual assault as a child?
As to your 4th contention, speculation about what might happen 12 years from now has nothing to do with a determination as to whether his parents should retain custody of the baby today. For example, sad as it may be, the risk that a particular child could end up using drugs 12 years from now exists all across our society.