I wonder, too, how Buchanan can write good columns sometimes, and awful ones at other times. The only hint I can find is that he also writes for “The Wanderer” a German Catholic newspaper out of Minnesota. They are the same way. On some Church matters they are brilliant and at other times they are not, like the current essay about why the Vatican wants us to get rid of Capitalism! I don’t read Buchanan’s column in the Wanderer because everyone else who writes for the paper is an “America Firster”. If anyone can figure it out, let me know.
"Paleoconservatives" are essentially henotheists. This means people who believe in a separate, valid "gxd" for each people. To Pat and his colleagues J*sus is an "aryan" northwestern European tribal deity to be invoked against Black and Hispanic chr*stians (who have in turn made J*sus one of their own). Unfortunately, this is what happens when you incarnate G-d. He not only must become human, but your own particular kind of human.
One reason the "palaeos" detest the Jews is that their G-d is indeed universal. Therefore by insisting on a single G-d for all humanity they "subvert" localized traditions in favor of a "new world order." I honestly believe that much of the "palaeos'" rhetoric about a "one world government" is directed against Mashiach HaMelekh.