I can offer a hypothesis that sometime in the future, the physicists will manage time travel, and inadvertently introduce modern microbial life into Earth's ancient past. I don't expect I'll be getting any research grants to study it, though.
The funny thing is that evolution would work with that hypothesis.
But a hypothesis sounds all “scientific” when it’s nothing more than a suggested explanation or even a conclusion, which then needs to be evaluated, tested, verified, before it can be considered a fact.
ID is indeed a hypothesis. That I am 200 times smarter than anyone who ever lived on the planet is a hypothesis. I’ll offer the posts I’ve made here at FR, except for the ones when I had been imbibing, or mad, or just wrong, as strong evidence of my hypothesis.
I’ve just offered more evidence than ID proponents have offered for theirs.